Cited by 29Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyMemory Processes and Influences

Developmental Aspects of Working and Associative Memory

Thaler, N. S., Goldstein, G., Pettegrew, J. W., Luther, J. F., Reynolds, C. R., Allen, D. N.·2013·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

Developmental differences between working and long-term associative memory were evaluated through a cross-sectional age difference study based on data from a memory battery's standardization sample. The scores of 856 children and adolescents ranging from 5 to 17 years of age were compared on memory subtests that assess verbal working and long-term memory. Data were examined using curve fitting and ANOVA procedures that evaluated age group and years of age differences. The major finding was that the developmental trajectories across age differed substantially between the two memory domains. The working memory trajectory was linear until age 11, whereas the long-term memory trajectory was curvilinear with an inflection point at age 8. Both trajectories plateaued after age 11. ANOVAs produced significant interactions between tests of working and associative memory with age, supporting the view that the age trajectories had differing courses. The results are discussed in terms of neurobiological implications for the two memory systems studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/arclin/acs114

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thaler, N. S., Goldstein, G., Pettegrew, J. W., Luther, J. F., Reynolds, C. R., & Allen, D. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldstein, G.
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2013-01-21
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
348-355
ISSN
  • 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-5843
OpenAlex
W2113888856
Cited by
29
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
working memory, long-term memory, associative memory, memory development, developmental trajectories, age differences, children and adolescents, verbal memory, memory systems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Verbal Learning, Memory, Long-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review