Cited by 509Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Functions and Memory

The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning — implications for training and transfer

Jaeggi, Susanne M., Studer-Luethi, Barbara, Buschkuehl, Martin, Su, Yi-Fen, Jonides, John, Perrig, Walter J.·2010·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.001

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was no difference in effect size between dual and single n-back training.

    “Additionally, we found no difference depending on whether studies used dual or single n-back, which corroborates previous findings (Jaeggi et al., 2014;Jaeggi et al., 2010).”

    From Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2010

  • Previous studies comparing single and dual n-back training have shown both versions are equally effective in producing generalization and have fairly similar transfer effects.

    “Previous studies comparing the effects of single and dual nback training have shown that both task versions seem to be equally effective in producing generalization and that the transfer effects are fairly similar”
  • Single n-back training, using only spatial or only verbal stimuli, has been reported to be as effective as dual n-back on measures of spatial reasoning.

    “In the case of the n-back, single n-back training in which the only spatial or only verbal stimuli are used has been reported as being as effective as the dual n-back (combining verbal and spatial) on measures of spatial reasoning (Jaeggi, Studer-Luethi, Buschkuehl, Su, Jonides, & Perrig, 2010).”

    From A simultaneous examination of two forms of working memory training: Evidence for near transfer only (2016) · cites this paper as Jaeggi, Studer-Luethi, Buschkuehl, Su, Jonides, & Perrig, 2010

  • Jaeggi et al. found that n-back training produced far transfer effects on fluid intelligence measures but no near transfer to measures of WM capacity.

    “In support of this idea, Jaeggi et al. [32] found that n-back training produced far transfer effects on fluid intelligence measures, which share a good deal of variance with WMU, but no near transfer to measures of WM capacity, which share little variance with WMU”
  • Previous studies reporting positive training effects have normally used single but highly demanding tasks, such as the dual n-back task, and/or participants attained high levels of performance over training, such as n-back levels of over 3.

    “Previous studies reporting positive training effects have normally used single but highly demanding tasks, such as the dual n-back task (Jaeggi et al., 2008, 2010, 2013) and/or participants attained high levels of performance over training, such as n-back levels of over 3 (Jaeggi et al., 2008, 2013).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2010

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaeggi, S. M., Studer-Luethi, B., Buschkuehl, M., Su, Y.-F., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
625-635
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068134008
Cited by
509
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 25
FWCI
32.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
n-back task, fluid intelligence, matrix reasoning, working memory capacity, cognitive training, transfer of training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review