Cited by 799Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy, Science, and History

V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description

Russell, Bertrand·1911·Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

Abstract

Bertrand Russell; V.—Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 11, Issue 1, 1 June 1911, Page

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, B.
Corresponding author
Russell, Bertrand
Venue
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Published
1911-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
108-128
ISSN
  • 0066-7374 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9264
OpenAlex
W2505960753
Cited by
799
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 51
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
Keywords
knowledge by acquaintance, knowledge by description, epistemology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review