Cited by 228Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Drug repositioning for orphan diseases

Open access
Sardana, D., Zhu, C., Zhang, M., Gudivada, R. C., Yang, L., Jegga, A. G.·2011·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract

The need and opportunity to discover therapeutics for rare or orphan diseases are enormous. Due to limited prevalence and/or commercial potential, of the approximately 6000 orphan diseases (defined by the FDA Orphan Drug Act as <200 000 US prevalence), only a small fraction (5%) is of interest to the biopharmaceutical industry. The fact that drug development is complicated, time-consuming and expensive with extremely low success rates only adds to the low rate of therapeutics available for orphan diseases. An alternative and efficient strategy to boost the discovery of orphan disease therapeutics is to find connections between an existing drug product and orphan disease. Drug Repositioning or Drug Repurposing--finding a new indication for a drug--is one way to maximize the potential of a drug. The advantages of this approach are manifold, but rational drug repositioning for orphan diseases is not trivial and poses several formidable challenges--pharmacologically and computationally. Most of the repositioned drugs currently in the market are the result of serendipity. One reason the connection between drug candidates and their potential new applications are not identified in an earlier or more systematic fashion is that the underlying mechanism 'connecting' them is either very intricate and unknown or indirect or dispersed and buried in an ever-increasing sea of information, much of which is emerging only recently and therefore is not well organized. In this study, we will review some of these issues and the current methodologies adopted or proposed to overcome them and translate chemical and biological discoveries into safe and effective orphan disease therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbr021

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most repurposed drugs are the result of serendipity, either observed through off-label prescriptions written by clinicians or discovered through patient experience.

    “However, most repurposed drugs are the result of serendipity7,8—either observed through off-label prescriptions written by clinicians, as with gabapentin and bupropion8, or discovered through patient experience, as with sildenafil6.”

    From A foundation model for clinician-centered drug repurposing (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yildirim MA, Goh KI, Cusick ME, et al. Drug-target net- work. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1119-26.
  2. Rothstein JD, Patel S, Regan MR, et al. Beta-lactam anti- biotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate trans- porter expression. Nature 2005;433:73-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sardana, D., Zhu, C., Zhang, M., Gudivada, R. C., Yang, L., & Jegga, A. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2011-04-18
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
346-356
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2145321215
Cited by
228
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • European Commission
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
drug repurposing, rare diseases, orphan drug development, drug target identification, computational drug discovery
MeSH terms
Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Orphan Drug Production, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Rare Diseases, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review