The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational models for predicting drug responses in cancer research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Yet, unlike with cell lines, high throughput characterization of drug response (i.e., IC50, AUC, etc.) in clinical tumor samples is not feasible29.”
From Exploiting convergent phenotypes to derive a pan-cancer cisplatin response gene expression signature (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11003 · Cited by 7,950
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Saito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · Cited by 5,309
Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection
Varma, S., & Simon, R. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-91 · Cited by 2,485
Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells
Garnett, M. J., Edelman, E. J., Heidorn, S. J., Greenman, C. D., Dastur, A., Lau, K. W., Greninger, P., Thompson, I. R., Luo, X., Soares, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11005 · Cited by 2,456
Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies
Haibe-Kains, B., El-Hachem, N., Birkbak, N. J., Jin, A. C., Beck, A. H., Aerts, H. J. W. L., & Quackenbush, J. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12831 · Cited by 499
Gillet, J.-P., Calcagno, A. M., Varma, S., Marino, M., Green, L. J., Vora, M. I., Patel, C., Orina, J. N., Eliseeva, T. A., Singal, V., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111840108 · Cited by 477
Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia Consortium, & The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer Consortium (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15736 · Cited by 418
A community computational challenge to predict the activity of pairs of compounds
Community, N.-D., Bansal, M., Yang, J., Karan, C., Menden, M. P., Costello, J. C., Tang, H., Xiao, G., Li, Y., Allen, J., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3052 · Cited by 321
Advances in the preclinical testing of cancer therapeutic hypotheses
Caponigro, G., & Sellers, W. R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3385 · Cited by 165
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1038/527S108a · DOI
- 10.1038/527S10a · DOI
- 10.1038/520290a · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aab1328 · DOI
- Baselga, 2015, AACR cancer progress report 2015, Clin Cancer Res, 21(Suppl 19), S1, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1846 · DOI
- Simon, 2013, Drug-diagnostics co-development in oncology, Front Oncol, 3, 315., 10.3389/fonc.2013.00315 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature15817 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature15816 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg3967 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3080 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg3920 · DOI
- Kidd, 2016, Mapping the effects of drugs on the immune system, Nat Biotechnol, 34, 47, 10.1038/nbt.3367 · DOI
- 10.1002/wsbm.1323 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbv020 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrc1951 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks1111 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-3499 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv701 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2877 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r110 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r47 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0070294 · DOI
- 10.1038/leu.2014.140 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv529 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0061318 · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.aab0990 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004498 · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.2004379 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3242 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1818 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1558 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1943 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12885-015-1237-6 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0145754 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10166 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/tpj.2014.45 · DOI
- 10.1186/1752-0509-8-74 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms150711220 · DOI
- 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0189 · DOI
- Ross, 2014, In vitro clinical trials: the future of cell-based profiling, Front Pharmacol, 5, 121., 10.3389/fphar.2014.00121 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djt007 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2971 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.61 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.068 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms3126 · DOI
- Chen, 2015, Relating hepatocellular carcinoma tumor samples and cell lines using gene expression data in translational research, BMC Med Genomics, 8(Suppl 2), S5, 10.1186/1755-8794-8-S2-S5 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0101183 · DOI
- 10.1002/psp4.14 · DOI
- 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0465 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1323934111 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1102826108 · DOI
- Neto EC Jang IS Friend SH , . The STREAM algorithm: computationally efficient ridge-regression via Bayesian model averaging, and applications to pharmacogenomic prediction of cancer cell line sensitivity. Pac Symp Biocomput 2014;27–38. · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-014-0353-7 · DOI
- Stetson, 2014, Computational identification of multi-omic correlates of anticancer therapeutic response, BMC Genomics, 15(Suppl 7), S2, 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S7-S2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu464 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2810 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0108990 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.412 · DOI · Paper page
- Cawley, 2010, On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation, J Mach Learn Res, 11, 2079
- 10.1093/bib/bbp016 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0107468 · DOI
- 10.1038/521261a · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0133850 · DOI
- Jaeger, 2015, Drug sensitivity in cancer cell lines is not tissue-specific, Mol Cancer, 14, 40., 10.1186/s12943-015-0312-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kadurin, A., Aliper, A., Kazennov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Khrabrov, K., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14073 · Cited by 350
Suphavilai, C., Chia, S., Sharma, A., Tu, L., Da Silva, R. P., Mongia, A., DasGupta, R., & Nagarajan, N. (2021) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-021-01000-y · Cited by 58
Naulaerts, S., Dang, C. C., & Ballester, P. J. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.20923 · Cited by 41
Wu, Y., Liu, Q., Qiu, Y., & Xie, L. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010367 · Cited by 34
Exploiting convergent phenotypes to derive a pan-cancer cisplatin response gene expression signature
Scarborough, J. A., Eschrich, S. A., Torres-Roca, J., Dhawan, A., & Scott, J. G. (2023) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-023-00375-y · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Azuaje, F.
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-07-21
- Pages
- bbw065
- ISSN
- 1467-5463
- 1477-4054
- PMC
- PMC5862310
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 11
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review