Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,034

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases

Li, Weizhong, Jaroszewski, Lukasz, Godzik, Adam·2001·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: We present a fast and flexible program for clustering large protein databases at different sequence identity levels. It takes less than 2 h for the all-against-all sequence comparison and clustering of the non-redundant protein database of over 560000 sequences on a high-end PC. The output database, including only the representative sequences, can be used for more efficient and sensitive database searches. Availability: The program is available from http://bioinformatics.burnham-inst.org/cd-hi Contact: liwz@sdsc.edu or adam@burnham-inst.org * To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.3.282

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Li, W., Jaroszewski, L., & Godzik, A.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
282-283
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2108211735
Cited by
1,034
References
1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.