Cited by 21Health Policy Implementation ScienceMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people with internalizing disorders: a rapid realist review

Open access
Roach, Anna, Cullinan, Sophie, Shafran, Roz, Heyman, Isobel, Bennett, Sophie·2023·British Medical Bulletin

Abstract

Introduction: Many children fail to receive the mental health treatments they need, despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy of brief and low-intensity psychological interventions. This review identifies the barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Sources of Data: PsycInfo, EMBASE and Medline were searched and a systematic approach to data extraction using Normalization Process Theory highlighted key mechanisms and contextual factors. Areas of Agreement: Ten interventions from 9 papers, including 371 young people, were included. Studies identified organizational demands, lack of implementation strategy and stigma as barriers to implementation, and clear training and plans for implementation as facilitators. Areas of Controversy: No standardized implementation outcomes were used across papers so meta-analysis was not possible. Growing Points: Barriers and facilitators have been clearly identified across different settings. Areas Timely for Developing Research: Longitudinal studies can identify methods and processes for enhancing long-term implementation and considers ways to monitor and evaluate uptake into routine practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bmb/ldad001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roach, A., Cullinan, S., Shafran, R., Heyman, I., & Bennett, S.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Roach, Anna
Venue
British Medical Bulletin
Published
2023-01-28
Volume
145
Issue
1
Pages
120-131
ISSN
  • 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8391
OpenAlex
W4318477889
Cited by
21
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Medical Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Beryl Alexander Charity and Great Ormond Street Hospital Children’s Charity (16HN11)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
brief psychological intervention, low-intensity intervention, children and young people, internalizing disorders, implementation barriers and facilitators, Normalization Process Theory, organizational requirements, stigma, implementation strategies, training, implementation outcomes
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Intervention, Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review