Cited by 40Peripheral Nerve DisordersNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory Interactions

INNERVATION TERRITORIES FOR TOUCH AND PAIN AFFERENTS OF SINGLE FASCICLES OF THE HUMAN ULNAR NERVE: MAPPING THROUGH INTRANEURAL MICRORECORDING AND MICROSTIMULATION

MARCHETTINI, PAOLO, CLINE, MARTHA, OCHOA, JOSE L.·1990·Brain

Abstract

The peripheral distribution of the fibre content of individual ulnar nerve fascicles supplying skin and muscles of the hand in human volunteers was indirectly mapped by tracing the fields of projected sensation evoked by intraneural electrical microstimulation (INMS) and by tracing receptive fields delineated through intraneural recording of afferent impulse activity elicited by natural stimulation of end organs. Moderate intensity suprathreshold INMS, delivered in cutaneous fascicles, induced nonpainful sensations projecting to stereotyped and coherent areas of skin, the fascicular projected fields (FPFs). Fascicular receptive fields (FRFs) were mapped during microneurographic recording by determining the area of skin which, when activated by light tactile stimuli, elicited afferent neural discharges recorded intraneurally. It was found that at a given electrode position in a skin nerve fascicle, moderate intensity INMS induced nonpainful sensations projecting to a cutaneous field (FPF) that coincides with the FRF, while high intensity INMS induced painful sensations projecting within the cutaneous field of nonpainful sensations. Pain induced by INMS in muscle nerve fascicles was projected to the muscles innervated by that fascicle and, in most instances, to areas beyond the muscular receptive field. The study demonstrates that individual ulnar nerve fascicles, at wrist levels, subserve well-defined cutaneous territories in the hand, and that the area of skin covered by the sum of all ulnar fascicular receptive or projected fields matches the maximal possible cutaneous distribution of the ulnar nerve. Insights of practical relevance regarding clinical expression of fascicular nerve injuries are also brought up by this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/113.5.1491

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some evidence suggests that fibers in a single fascicle respond to a spatially restricted patch of skin.

    “Some evidence suggests that fibers in a single fascicle respond to a spatially restricted patch of skin (Ekedahl et al., 1997); as might be expected, then, stimulation of a fascicle elicits sensations that are projected to a spatially restricted patch of skin (Marchettini et al., 1990).”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Marchettini et al., 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MARCHETTINI, P., CLINE, M., & OCHOA, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Brain
Published
1990
Volume
113
Issue
5
Pages
1491-1500
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2176092225
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R0I-NS-24740, R0I-NS-24766)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
ulnar nerve, nerve fascicles, microneurography, muscle innervation, skin sensation
MeSH terms
Adult, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscles, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Afferent, Pain, Physical Stimulation, Sensation, Skin, Touch, Ulnar Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review