The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception
Abstract
We studied the capacity of normal humans to discriminate the direction of motion of visual stimuli when areas V1 or V5 were reversibly inactivated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We found that (i) magnetic stimulation of V5 at intervals of -20 to +10 ms before or after the onset of visual stimulation was effective in abolishing motion perception--other delays were not; (ii) magnetic stimulation of V1 abolished motion perception only marginally and at delays which were significantly different from those obtained with V5, the stimulation now being effective only at delays of 60-70 ms after the onset of visual stimulation. We conclude (i) that stimulation of V5 is a much more potent way of inducing akinetopsia (motion imperception) than stimulation of V1; (ii) that perceptually effective visual motion signals reach V5 at or before 30 ms and reach V1 at or before 60 ms--consequently, perceptually effective motion signals reach V5 before they reach V1; (iii) that, given the time course of arrival of signals in V1 and V5, it takes about 30-50 ms for signals from V1 to reach V5. We conclude further that there are probably two components reaching V5 from the retina, a fast one which bypasses V1 and a slow one which reaches it through V1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework
Dehaene, S. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00123-2 · Cited by 2,498
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain
Hallett, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018000 · Cited by 1,603
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Applications in Neuropsychiatry
George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H., & Sackeim, H. A. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.300 · Cited by 496
The disunity of consciousness.
Zeki, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00081-0 · Cited by 337
Self-citationToward a theory of visual consciousness.
Zeki, S., & Bartels, A. (1999) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1006/ccog.1999.0390 · Cited by 271
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckers, G., & Zeki, S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-60
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2069966140
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/118.1.49
- The paper
- Beckers, G., & Zeki, S. (1995). The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/118.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.