Cited by 271Visual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceMultisensory perception and integration

Toward a theory of visual consciousness.

Zeki, S., Bartels, A.·1999·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

The visual brain consists of several parallel, functionally specialized processing systems, each having several stages (nodes) which terminate their tasks at different times; consequently, simultaneously presented attributes are perceived at the same time if processed at the same node and at different times if processed by different nodes. Clinical evidence shows that these processing systems can act fairly autonomously. Damage restricted to one system compromises specifically the perception of the attribute that that system is specialized for; damage to a given node of a processing system that leaves earlier nodes intact results in a degraded perceptual capacity for the relevant attribute, which is directly related to the physiological capacities of the cells left intact by the damage. By contrast, a system that is spared when all others are damaged can function more or less normally. Moreover, internally created visual percepts-illusions, afterimages, imagery, and hallucinations-activate specifically the nodes specialized for the attribute perceived. Finally, anatomical evidence shows that there is no final integrator station in the brain, one which receives input from all visual areas; instead, each node has multiple outputs and no node is recipient only. Taken together, the above evidence leads us to propose that each node of a processing-perceptual system creates its own microconsciousness. We propose that, if any binding occurs to give us our integrated image of the visual world, it must be a binding between microconsciousnesses generated at different nodes. Since any two microconsciousnesses generated at any two nodes can be bound together, perceptual integration is not hierarchical, but parallel and postconscious. By contrast, the neural machinery conferring properties on those cells whose activity has a conscious correlate is hierarchical, and we refer to it as generative binding, to distinguish it from the binding that might occur between the microconsciousnesses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ccog.1999.0390

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zeki and Bartels' theory holds that consciousness manifests in the brain as nested hierarchies.

    “Such a hierarchical view of consciousness represents the basis of Zeki and Bartel’s (Zeki and Bartels, 1999; Zeki, 2003) theory of how consciousness manifests in the brain.”

    From The Easy Part of the Hard Problem: A Resonance Theory of Consciousness (2019) · cites this paper as Zeki and Bartels, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeki, S., & Bartels, A.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Zeki, S.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
225-259
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119948735
Cited by
271
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
visual awareness, parallel processing systems, perceptual integration, binding problem, visual cortex, optical illusions, afterimages, visual imagery, hallucinations
MeSH terms
Agnosia, Consciousness, Humans, Time Factors, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review