Cited by 420Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNerve injury and regeneration

Remyelination protects axons from demyelination-associated axon degeneration

Irvine, K. A., Blakemore, W. F.·2008·Brain

Abstract

In multiple sclerosis, demyelination of the CNS axons is associated with axonal injury and degeneration, which is now accepted as the major cause of neurological disability in the disease. Although the kinetics and the extent of axonal damage have been described in detail, the mechanisms by which it occurs are as yet unclear; one suggestion is failure of remyelination. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that failure of prompt remyelination contributes to axonal degeneration following demyelination. Remyelination was inhibited by exposing the brain to 40 Gy of X-irradiation prior to cuprizone intoxication and this resulted in a significant increase in the extent of axonal degeneration and loss compared to non-irradiated cuprizone-fed mice. To exclude the possibility that this increase was a consequence of the X-irradiation and to highlight the significance of remyelination, we restored remyelinating capacity to the X-irradiated mouse brain by transplanting of GFP-expressing embryo-derived neural progenitors. Restoring the remyelinating capacity in these mice resulted in a significant increase in axon survival compared to non-transplanted, X-irradiated cuprizone-intoxicated mice. Our results support the concept that prompt remyelination protects axons from demyelination-associated axonal loss and that remyelination failure contributes to the axon loss that occurs in multiple sclerosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awn080

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irvine, K. A., & Blakemore, W. F.
Affiliations
Multiple Sclerosis Society (GB)
Venue
Brain
Published
2008-01-29
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
1464-1477
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2169924875
Cited by
420
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
remyelination, demyelination, axonal degeneration, multiple sclerosis, cuprizone, X-ray irradiation, axonal loss, demyelinating disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Corpus Callosum, Cuprizone, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Degeneration, Nerve Regeneration, X-Rays, Models, Animal, Stem Cell Transplantation, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review