Cited by 408Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation

Open access
Villeneuve, Sylvia, Rabinovici, Gil D., Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I., Madison, Cindee, Ayakta, Nagehan, Ghosh, Pia M., La Joie, Renaud, Arthur-Bentil, Samia Kate +15 more·2015·Brain

Abstract

Amyloid-β, a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease, begins accumulating up to two decades before the onset of dementia, and can be detected in vivo applying amyloid-β positron emission tomography tracers such as carbon-11-labelled Pittsburgh compound-B. A variety of thresholds have been applied in the literature to define Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography positivity, but the ability of these thresholds to detect early amyloid-β deposition is unknown, and validation studies comparing Pittsburgh compound-B thresholds to post-mortem amyloid burden are lacking. In this study we first derived thresholds for amyloid positron emission tomography positivity using Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography in 154 cognitively normal older adults with four complementary approaches: (i) reference values from a young control group aged between 20 and 30 years; (ii) a Gaussian mixture model that assigned each subject a probability of being amyloid-β-positive or amyloid-β-negative based on Pittsburgh compound-B index uptake; (iii) a k-means cluster approach that clustered subjects into amyloid-β-positive or amyloid-β-negative based on Pittsburgh compound-B uptake in different brain regions (features); and (iv) an iterative voxel-based analysis that further explored the spatial pattern of early amyloid-β positron emission tomography signal. Next, we tested the sensitivity and specificity of the derived thresholds in 50 individuals who underwent Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography during life and brain autopsy (mean time positron emission tomography to autopsy 3.1 ± 1.8 years). Amyloid at autopsy was classified using Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) criteria, unadjusted for age. The analytic approaches yielded low thresholds (standard uptake value ratiolow = 1.21, distribution volume ratiolow = 1.08) that represent the earliest detectable Pittsburgh compound-B signal, as well as high thresholds (standard uptake value ratiohigh = 1.40, distribution volume ratiohigh = 1.20) that are more conservative in defining Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography positivity. In voxel-wise contrasts, elevated Pittsburgh compound-B retention was first noted in the medial frontal cortex, then the precuneus, lateral frontal and parietal lobes, and finally the lateral temporal lobe. When compared to post-mortem amyloid burden, low proposed thresholds were more sensitive than high thresholds (sensitivities: distribution volume ratiolow 81.0%, standard uptake value ratiolow 83.3%; distribution volume ratiohigh 61.9%, standard uptake value ratiohigh 62.5%) for CERAD moderate-to-frequent neuritic plaques, with similar specificity (distribution volume ratiolow 95.8%; standard uptake value ratiolow, distribution volume ratiohigh and standard uptake value ratiohigh 100.0%). A receiver operator characteristic analysis identified optimal distribution volume ratio (1.06) and standard uptake value ratio (1.20) thresholds that were nearly identical to the a priori distribution volume ratiolow and standard uptake value ratiolow. In summary, we found that frequently applied thresholds for Pittsburgh compound-B positivity (typically at or above distribution volume ratiohigh and standard uptake value ratiohigh) are overly stringent in defining amyloid positivity. Lower thresholds in this study resulted in higher sensitivity while not compromising specificity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awv112

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For amyloid imaging, different ligands, methods of image acquisition, and image processing can result in different thresholds when compared to neuropathologic standards.

    “For amyloid imaging, where over a decade of data are available, different ligands, methods of image acquisition, and image processing can result in different thresholds when compared to neuropathologic standards [21,22,196].”
  • In a subanalysis of a study aimed to identify different Aβ PET cut-offs, the first significant SUVR differences between controls and a group with sub-threshold SUVRs were located in the medial frontal cortex and the precuneus, similar to our early Aβ regions.

    “They found that the first significant SUVR differences between the controls and a group with sub-threshold SUVRs were located in the medial frontal cortex and the precuneus, similar to our early Aβ regions.”
  • Mixture modeling provides an unbiased threshold for abnormality and is a well-established method for defining Aβ PET cut-offs.

    “Mixture modeling statistics provide an unbiased threshold for abnormality (i.e., the diagnosis or status is not used in analysis) and it is a well-established method for defining Aβ PET cut-offs12, 17, 60, 61.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Aizenstein HJ, Nebes RD, Saxton JA, Price JC, Mathis CA, Tsopelas ND, et al. Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly. Arch Neurol 2008; 65: 1509-17.
  2. Armstrong MJ, Litvan I, Lang AE, Bak TH, Bhatia KP, Borroni B, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 2013; 80: 496-503.
  3. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 795-804.
  4. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 795-804.
  5. Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Beach TG, Bedell BJ, Coleman RE, Doraiswamy PM, et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid- beta plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 669-78.
  6. Clark CM, Schneider JA, Bedell BJ, Beach TG, Bilker WB, Mintun MA, et al. Use of florbetapir-PET for imaging beta-amyloid path- ology. JAMA 2011; 305: 275-83.
  7. Driscoll I, Troncoso JC, Rudow G, Sojkova J, Pletnikova O, Zhou Y, et al. Correspondence between in vivo (11)C-PiB-PET amyloid ima- ging and postmortem, region-matched assessment of plaques. Acta Neuropathol 2012; 124: 823-31.
  8. Ducharme S, Guiot MC, Nikelski J, Chertkow H. Does a positive Pittsburgh Compound B scan in a patient with dementia equal Alzheimer disease? JAMA Neurol 2013; 70: 912-4.
  9. Fleisher AS, Chen K, Quiroz YT, Jakimovich LJ, Gomez MG, Langois CM, et al. Florbetapir PET analysis of amyloid-beta deposition in the presenilin 1 E280A autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease kindred: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 1057-65.
  10. Forman MS, Farmer J, Johnson JK, Clark CM, Arnold SE, Coslett HB, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 952-62.
  11. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76: 1006-14.
  12. Grinberg LT, Wang X, Wang C, Sohn PD, Theofilas P, Sidhu M, et al. Argyrophilic grain disease differs from other tauopathies by lacking tau acetylation. Acta Neuropathol 2013; 125: 581-93.
  13. Hedden T, Van Dijk KR, Becker JA, Mehta A, Sperling RA, Johnson KA, et al. Disruption of functional connectivity in clinically normal older adults harboring amyloid burden. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 12686-94.
  14. Hyman BT, Trojanowski JQ. Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997; 56: 1095-7.
  15. Ikonomovic MD, Abrahamson EE, Price JC, Hamilton RL, Mathis CA, Paljug WR, et al. Early AD pathology in a [C-11]PiB-negative case: a PiB-amyloid imaging, biochemical, and immunohistochemical study. Acta Neuropathol 2012; 123: 433-47.
  16. Jack CR, Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic bio- markers. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 207-16.
  17. Jack CR, Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 119-28.
  18. Jack CR, Jr, Wiste HJ, Lesnick TG, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Vemuri P, et al. Brain beta-amyloid load approaches a plateau. Neurology 2013; 80: 890-6.
  19. Kantarci K, Yang C, Schneider JA, Senjem ML, Reyes DA, Lowe VJ, et al. Antemortem amyloid imaging and beta-amyloid pathology in a case with dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33: 878-85.
  20. Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, Holt DP, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol 2004; 55: 306-19.
  21. Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, Benzinger TL, Devous MD, Sr., Jagust WJ, et al. The Centiloid Project: Standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11: 1- 15, e4.
  22. Landau SM, Thomas BA, Thurfjell L, Schmidt M, Margolin R, Mintun M, et al. Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of three radiotracers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 41: 1398-407.
  23. Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Alexoff DL. Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol 1996; 16: 834-40.
  24. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Alafuzoff I, Kril J, et al. Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. Acta Neuropathol 2010; 119: 1-4.
  25. Magaki S, Yong WH, Khanlou N, Tung S, Vinters HV. Comorbidity in dementia: update of an ongoing autopsy study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62: 1722-8.
  26. McKhann G, Drachman DA, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939-44.
  27. Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1991; 41: 479-86.
  28. Mormino EC, Betensky RA, Hedden T, Schultz AP, Ward A, Huijbers W, et al. Amyloid and APOE {varepsilon}4 interact to influence short-term decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2014; 82: 1760-7.
  29. Murray ME, Cannon A, Graff-Radford NR, Liesinger AM, Rutherford NJ, Ross OA, et al. Differential clinicopathologic and genetic features of late-onset amnestic dementias. Acta Neuropathol 2014; 128: 411-21.
  30. Newell KL, Hyman BT, Growdon JH, Hedley-Whyte ET. Application of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-Reagan Institute criteria for the neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999; 58: 1147-55.
  31. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004; 256: 183-94.
  32. Price JC, Klunk WE, Lopresti BJ, Lu X, Hoge JA, Ziolko SK, et al. Kinetic modeling of amyloid binding in humans using PET imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005; 25: 1528-47.
  33. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntii T. Vascular dementia: diagnos- tic criteria for research studies. Neurology 1993; 43: 250-60.
  34. Rowe CC, Ellis KA, Rimajova M, Bourgeat P, Pike KE, Jones G, et al. Amyloid imaging results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Neurobiology of aging 2010; 31: 1275-83.
  35. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. The neuro- pathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impair- ment. Ann Neurol 2009; 66: 200-8.
  36. Sojkova J, Driscoll I, Iacono D, Zhou Y, Codispoti KE, Kraut MA, et al. In vivo fibrillar beta-amyloid detected using [11C]PiB positron emission tomography and neuropathologic assessment in older adults. Arch Neurol 2011; 68: 232-40.
  37. Sperling RA, Laviolette PS, O'Keefe K, O'Brien J, Rentz DM, Pihlajamaki M, et al. Amyloid deposition is associated with im- paired default network function in older persons without dementia. Neuron 2009; 63: 178-88.
  38. Sun FT, Schriber RA, Greenia JM, He J, Gitcho A, Jagust WJ. Automated template-based PET region of interest analyses in the aging brain. NeuroImage 2007; 34: 608-17.
  39. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 2002; 15: 273-89.
  40. Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O, et al. Amyloid beta deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 357-67.
  41. Villeneuve S, Reed BR, Wirth M, Haase CM, Madison CM, Ayakta N, et al. Cortical thickness mediates the effect of beta-amyloid on episodic memory. Neurology 2014; 82: 761-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villeneuve, S., Rabinovici, G. D., Cohn-Sheehy, B. I., Madison, C., Ayakta, N., Ghosh, P. M., La Joie, R., Arthur-Bentil, S. K., Vogel, J. W., Marks, S. M., Lehmann, M., Rosen, H. J., Reed, B., Olichney, J., Boxer, A. L., Miller, B. L., Borys, E., Jin, L.-W., Huang, E. J., Grinberg, L. T., DeCarli, C., Seeley, W. W., & Jagust, W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
Brain
Published
2015-05-06
Volume
138
Issue
7
Pages
2020-2033
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2174753847
Cited by
408
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 4
FWCI
26.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hellman Family Foundation
  • Tau Consortium
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG 12435, P30AG10129, P30AG010129, R01AG021028, R01AG045611, P01 AG1972403, R01AG032306, P01AG003991, K23AG031861, K24AG045333, R01AG038791, P01AG012435, P01AG019724, R01AG034570, R01AG031563, P50AG023501)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS092089)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Pittsburgh compound B, amyloid PET, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid burden, sensitivity and specificity, Gaussian mixture model, K-means clustering, voxel-based analysis, medial frontal cortex, precuneus, lateral temporal lobe, cognitively normal older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Reference Values, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review