The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bifidobacterium longum, a lactic acid-producing intestinal bacterium inhibits colon cancer and modulates the intermediate biomarkers of colon carcinogenesis
Abstract
The human colon can be described as a complex microbial ecosystem, comprising several hundred bacterial species. Some of these enteric bacteria are beneficial to the host and have been shown to exert antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic properties. We have investigated the colon tumor inhibitory activity of Bifidobacterium longum, a lactic acid-producing enterobacterium. The modifying effects of this lactic culture on colonic mucosal and/or tumor cell proliferation, ODC activity and ras-p21 oncoprotein expression in colon carcinogenesis were also analyzed. Male F344 rats were fed a modified AIN-76A diet containing 0 or 2% lyophilized cultures of B. longum and s.c. administered azoxymethane (AOM) dissolved in normal saline at a dose of 15 mg/kg body wt, once weekly for 2 weeks. Vehicle controls received an equal volume of normal saline s.c. Animals were maintained on control or experimental diets until termination of the study. Animals intended for analysis of cell proliferation were killed 20 weeks after the second AOM injection, whereas animals intended for colon tumor analysis and measurement of ODC activity and ras-p21 expression were killed 40 weeks after the last AOM injection. The data demonstrate that dietary administration of lyophilized cultures of B. longum resulted in significant suppression of colon tumor incidence and tumor multiplicity and also reduced tumor volume. Results also revealed that ingestion of B. longum significantly inhibited AOM-induced cell proliferation, ODC activity and expression of ras-p21 oncoprotein. Data suggest that oral administration of probiotic B. longum exerts strong antitumor activity, as indicated by modulation of the intermediate biomarkers of colon cancer, and consequently reduced tumor outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of Diet and Lactobacillus acidophilus Supplements on Human Fecal Bacterial Enzymes23
Goldin, B. R., Swenson, L., Dwyer, J., Sexton, M., & Gorbach, S. L. (1980) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/64.2.255 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties
Saarela, M., Mogensen, G., Fondén, R., Mättö, J., & Mattila-Sandholm, T. (2000) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1656(00)00375-8 · Cited by 1,202
Brouns, F., Bjorck, I., Frayn, K. N., Gibbs, A. L., Lang, V., Slama, G., & Wolever, T. M. S. (2005) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr2005100 · Cited by 1,093
Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases
Zhang, Y.-J., Li, S., Gan, R.-Y., Zhou, T., Xu, D.-P., & Li, H.-B. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16047493 · Cited by 1,055
“longum exerted strong antitumor activity, as modulation of the intermediate biomarkers of colon cancer indicated antimutagenic effects [106].”
BackgroundReview article: bifidobacteria as probiotic agents – physiological effects and clinical benefits
PICARD, C., FIORAMONTI, J., FRANCOIS, A., ROBINSON, T., NEANT, F., & MATUCHANSKY, C. (2005) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02615.x · Cited by 618
Probiotic Bacteria: A Promising Tool in Cancer Prevention and Therapy
Górska, A., Przystupski, D., Niemczura, M. J., & Kulbacka, J. (2019) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-019-01679-8 · Cited by 344
Importance of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer
Eslami, M., Yousefi, B., Kokhaei, P., Hemati, M., Nejad, Z. R., Arabkari, V., & Namdar, A. (2019) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.28473 · Cited by 285
Impact of Coffee Consumption on the Gut Microbiota: A Human Volunteer Study
Jaquet, M., Rochat, I., Moulin, J., Cavin, C., & Bibiloni, R. (2009) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.011 · Cited by 232
Le Leu, R. K., Brown, I. L., Hu, Y., Bird, A. R., Jackson, M., Esterman, A., & Young, G. P. (2005) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/135.5.996 · Cited by 215
Rafter, J. (2003) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00056-8 · Cited by 208
Mojibi, P. (2018) · Iranian journal of pathology · doi:10.30699/ijp.14.1.41 · Cited by 40
The effect of probiotic fermented milk and inulin on the functions and microecology of the intestine
Sairanen, U., Piirainen, L., Gråsten, S., Tompuri, T., Mättö, J., Saarela, M., & Korpela, R. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Research · doi:10.1017/s0022029907002713 · Cited by 26
Wei, X., Yu, L., Zhang, C., Ni, Y., Zhang, H., Zhai, Q., & Tian, F. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12050922 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 833-841
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2111337712
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.