Cited by 13Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Maternal Fish Consumption in Pregnancy Is Associated with a Bifidobacterium-Dominant Microbiome Profile in Infants

Open access
Simione, Meg, Harshman, Stephanie G., Castro, Ines, Linnemann, Rachel, Roche, Brianna, Ajami, Nadim J., Petrosino, Joseph F., Raspini, Benedetta +5 more·2020·Current Developments in Nutrition

Abstract

National guidelines suggest that pregnant women consume 2–3 servings of fish weekly and often focus exclusively on limiting mercury exposure. We examined if meeting this recommendation in the third trimester of pregnancy was associated with differences in infant fecal microbiota composition and diversity. We used multinomial regression to analyze data from 114 infant–mother dyads. Applying 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we identified 3 infant fecal microbiota profiles: Bifidobacterium dominant, Enterobacter dominant, and Escherichia dominant. We found that 20% of mothers met the recommended fish consumption, and those infants whose mothers met the recommendation were more likely to have a Bifidobacterium-dominant profile than an Escherichia-dominant profile (RR ratio: 4.61; 95% CI: 1.40, 15.15; P = 0.01). In multivariable models, the significant association persisted (P < 0.05). Our findings support the need to expand recommendations focusing on the beneficial effects of fish consumption on the infant fecal microbiota profile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cdn/nzz133

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simione, M., Harshman, S. G., Castro, I., Linnemann, R., Roche, B., Ajami, N. J., Petrosino, J. F., Raspini, B., Portale, S., Camargo, Jr., Taveras, E. M., Hasegawa, K., & Fiechtner, L.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Harshman, Stephanie G.
Venue
Current Developments in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
nzz133
ISSN
2475-2991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995147755
Cited by
13
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Developments in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (K24DK105989, P30DK040561, UG3/UH3 OD023253, U01 AI-087881, R01 AI134940, R01 AI137091)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS022986)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1K23HD090222-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
maternal fish consumption, pregnancy, infant gut microbiota, Bifidobacterium, fecal microbiota composition, microbiome diversity, third trimester, mercury exposure, dietary recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review