The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novelty and Familiarity Activations in PET Studies of Memory Encoding and Retrieval
Open accessAbstract
Nine young right-handed men viewed colored pictures of people, scenes, and landscapes. Then, 24 hr later while undergoing PET scanning, they viewed previously studied (OLD) pictures in one type of scan, and previously not seen (NEW) pictures in another. The OLD-NEW subtraction of PET images indicates familiarity, and the NEW-OLD indicates novelty. Familiarity activations, signalling aspects of retrieval, were observed in the left and right frontal areas, and posterior regions bilaterally. Novelty activations were in the right limbic regions, and bilaterally in temporal and parietal regions, including area 37. These latter activations were located similarly to novelty activations in previous PET studies using visual words and auditory sentences, suggesting the existence of brain regions specializing in transmodal novelty assessment. The effects of novelty are seen both behaviorally and in replicable patterns of cortical and subcortical activation. We propose a 'novelty/encoding hypothesis': (1) novelty assessment represents an early stage of long-term memory encoding; (2) elaborate, meaning-based encoding processes operate on the incoming information to the extent of its novelty, and therefore (3) the probability of long-term storage of information varies directly with the novelty of the information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Self-citationThe Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · cited 1×
“The right limbic novelty activations observed in the present study probably have little to do with processes required for priming, because it is known that medial temporal lobe damage does not produce impairment in perceptual priming (Schacter 1987; Squire 1987).”
BackgroundLarge-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Practice-related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning
Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A.-M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/4.1.8 · Cited by 1,593
Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex
Sokolov, E. N. (1963) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553 · Cited by 1,026
Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.11.1576 · Cited by 593
VALENSTEIN, E., BOWERS, D., VERFAELLIE, M., HEILMAN, K. M., DAY, A., & WATSON, R. T. (1987) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/110.6.1631 · Cited by 487
Cited by
Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies
Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290051137585 · Cited by 3,598
The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory
Lisman, J. E., & Grace, A. A. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,983
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis
Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002034 · Cited by 1,879
Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness.
Wheeler, M. A., Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.331 · Cited by 1,751
Self-citationLong-axis specialization of the human hippocampus
Poppenk, J., Evensmoen, H. R., Moscovitch, M., & Nadel, L. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.005 · Cited by 1,100
Metadata
- Authors
- Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., Craik, F. I. M., Habib, R., & Houle, S.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-79
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2121169817
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 23.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novelty and Familiarity Activations in PET Studies of Memory Encoding and Retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/6.1.71
- The paper
- Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., Craik, F. I. M., Habib, R., & Houle, S. (1996). Novelty and Familiarity Activations in PET Studies of Memory Encoding and Retrieval. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/6.1.71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.