Cited by 487Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Retrosplenial amnesia

VALENSTEIN, EDWARD, BOWERS, DAWN, VERFAELLIE, MIEKE, HEILMAN, KENNETH M., DAY, ARTHUR, WATSON, ROBERT T.·1987·Brain

Abstract

A 39-year-old man developed retrograde and anterograde amnesia following haemorrhage from an arteriovenous malformation situated near the splenium of the corpus callosum. MRI studies demonstrated damage to the splenium, and to a region containing the retrosplenial cortex and the cingulate bundle. The fornix was anterior and inferior to the site of maximal damage, but may have been involved; the stria terminalis was probably spared. Structures known to be important in memory but spared by the lesion included the hippocampus, thalamus, and basal forebrain. The retrosplenial cortex receives input from the subiculum and projects to the anterior thalamus, thus providing an alternative route between hippocampus and thalamus. Perhaps more importantly, medial temporal structures involved in memory receive anterior thalamic input directly via the cingulate bundle and indirectly through a relay in the retrosplenial cortex. We suggest that this thalamocortical portion of Papez' circuit may be important in memory, and that lesions of the cingulum and retrosplenial cortex may cause amnesia by disrupting this pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/110.6.1631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both retrosplenial damage and hippocampal damage can cause anterograde amnesia.

    “This outcome is to be expected as both retrosplenial damage and hippocampal damage can cause anterograde amnesia (Spiers et al., 2001; Valenstein et al., 1987; Vann et al., 2009)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Valenstein et al., 1987

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VALENSTEIN, E., BOWERS, D., VERFAELLIE, M., HEILMAN, K. M., DAY, A., & WATSON, R. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
VALENSTEIN, EDWARD
Venue
Brain
Published
1987
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
1631-1646
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W4233322041
Cited by
487
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
retrograde amnesia, anterograde amnesia, arteriovenous malformation, splenium of corpus callosum, retrosplenial cortex, Papez circuit, thalamocortical circuits, memory, fornix, stria terminalis, hippocampus, anterior thalamic nuclei
MeSH terms
Adult, Amnesia, Brain, Cerebral Angiography, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Corpus Callosum, Follow-Up Studies, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review