Cited by 237Neural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding

Open access
Engel, A.·1997·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Most cognitive functions are based on highly parallel and distributed information processing by the brain. A paradigmatic example is provided by the vertebrate visual system where numerous cortical areas have been described which analyse different types of visual information. At present, it is unclear how information can be integrated and how coherent representational states can be established in such distributed systems. We suggest that this so-called 'binding problem' may be solved in the temporal domain. The hypothesis is that synchronization of neuronal discharges can serve for the integration of distributed neurons into cell assemblies and that this process may underlie the selection of perceptually and behaviourally relevant information. We review experimental results, mainly obtained in the visual system, which support this temporal binding hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/7.6.571

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple sclerosis patients with damage to the myelin of the optic nerve typically exhibit conduction delays of around 20 ms in the latency of the P1 component of the visual-evoked potential.

    “For example, multiple sclerosis patients with damage to the myelin of the optic nerve typically exhibit conduction delays of around 20 ms in the latency of the P1 component of the visual-evoked potential.[46][47][48]”
  • Cycles of demyelination and remyelination in multiple sclerosis are associated with fluctuations in conduction velocity and symptomatology, including psychotic symptomatology.

    “Such a possibility would be akin to the cycles of demyelination and remyelination often experienced by patients with multiple sclerosis 72 : cycles that have been shown to be associated with fluctuations in conduction velocity 46 and symptomatology, including psychotic symptomatology.[73][74][75]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engel, A.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Engel, A.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
571-582
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W1996044177
Cited by
237
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
binding problem, neuronal synchronization, response selection, perceptual binding, cell assemblies, visual system, time domain, parallel distributed processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review