Cited by 262Neural dynamics and brain functionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The neurophysics of consciousness

John, E.Roy·2002·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

Consciousness combines information about attributes of the present multimodal sensory environment with relevant elements of the past. Information from each modality is continuously fractionated into distinct features, processed locally by different brain regions relatively specialized for extracting these disparate components and globally by interactions among these regions. Information is represented by levels of synchronization within neuronal populations and of coherence among multiple brain regions that deviate from random fluctuations. Significant deviations constitute local and global negative entropy, or information. Local field potentials reflect the degree of synchronization among the neurons of the local ensembles. Large-scale integration, or 'binding', is proposed to involve oscillations of local field potentials that play an important role in facilitating synchronization and coherence, assessed by neuronal coincidence detectors, and parsed into perceptual frames by cortico-thalamo-cortical loops. The most probable baseline levels of local synchrony, coherent interactions among brain regions, and frame durations have been quantitatively described in large studies of their age-appropriate normative distributions and are considered as an approximation to a conscious 'ground state'. The level of consciousness during anesthesia can be accurately predicted by the magnitude and direction of reversible multivariate deviations from this ground state. An invariant set of changes takes place during anesthesia, independent of the particular anesthetic agent. Evidence from a variety of neuroscience areas supporting these propositions, together with the invariant reversible electrophysiological changes observed with loss and return of consciousness, are used to provide a foundation for this theory of consciousness. This paper illustrates the increasingly recognized need to consider global as well as local processes in the search for better explanations of how the brain accomplishes the transformation from synchronous and distributed neuronal discharges to seamless global subjective awareness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00142-x

Cites

209 of 209 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
John, E. R.
Affiliations
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
John, E.Roy
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139300351
Cited by
262
References
209
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
consciousness, neuronal synchronization, local field potentials, negentropy, binding problem, anesthesia, global coherence, theory of consciousness
MeSH terms
Brain, Consciousness, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Genes, Humans, Models, Neurological, Oscillometry, Perception, Quantum Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review