Cited by 72Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Single Neuron Firing Properties Impact Correlation-Based Population Coding

Open access
Hong, Sungho, Ratté, Stéphanie, Prescott, Steven A., De Schutter, Erik·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Correlated spiking has been widely observed, but its impact on neural coding remains controversial. Correlation arising from comodulation of rates across neurons has been shown to vary with the firing rates of individual neurons. This translates into rate and correlation being equivalently tuned to the stimulus; under those conditions, correlated spiking does not provide information beyond that already available from individual neuron firing rates. Such correlations are irrelevant and can reduce coding efficiency by introducing redundancy. Using simulations and experiments in rat hippocampal neurons, we show here that pairs of neurons receiving correlated input also exhibit correlations arising from precise spike-time synchronization. Contrary to rate comodulation, spike-time synchronization is unaffected by firing rate, thus enabling synchrony- and rate-based coding to operate independently. The type of output correlation depends on whether intrinsic neuron properties promote integration or coincidence detection: “ideal” integrators (with spike generation sensitive to stimulus mean) exhibit rate comodulation, whereas ideal coincidence detectors (with spike generation sensitive to stimulus variance) exhibit precise spike-time synchronization. Pyramidal neurons are sensitive to both stimulus mean and variance, and thus exhibit both types of output correlation proportioned according to which operating mode is dominant. Our results explain how different types of correlations arise based on how individual neurons generate spikes, and why spike-time synchronization and rate comodulation can encode different stimulus properties. Our results also highlight the importance of neuronal properties for population-level coding insofar as neural networks can employ different coding schemes depending on the dominant operating mode of their constituent neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3735-11.2012

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensitivity of individual neurons to synaptic fluctuations can vary with neural subtype or cortical area and with biophysical cellular properties, such as membrane capacitance and conductance.

    “Furthermore, the sensitivity of individual neurons to synaptic fluctuations can vary with neural subtype or cortical area and with biophysical cellular properties, such as membrane capacitance and conductance89–93.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [91]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Abeles M 1991 Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, S., Ratté, S., Prescott, S. A., & De Schutter, E.
Affiliations
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-01-25
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
1413-1428
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1980133581
Cited by
72
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS076706, R01NS076706)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
population coding, coincidence detection, neural integration, pyramidal neurons, hippocampal neurons, firing rate, coding redundancy
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Normal Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review