Cited by 109Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionIon channel regulation and function

MGluR-Mediated Calcium Waves that Invade the Soma Regulate Firing in Layer V Medial Prefrontal Cortical Pyramidal Neurons

Open access
Hagenston, A. M., Fitzpatrick, J. S., Yeckel, M. F.·2008·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Factors that influence the activity of prefrontal cortex (PFC) pyramidal neurons are likely to play an important role in working memory function. One such factor may be the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. Here we investigate the hypothesis that metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs)-mediated waves of internally released Ca2+ can regulate the intrinsic excitability and firing patterns of PFC pyramidal neurons. Synaptic or focal pharmacological activation of mGluRs triggered Ca2+ waves in the dendrites and somata of layer V medial PFC pyramidal neurons. These Ca2+ waves often evoked a transient SK-mediated hyperpolarization followed by a prolonged depolarization that respectively decreased and increased neuronal excitability. Generation of the hyperpolarization depended on whether the Ca2+ wave invaded or came near to the soma. The depolarization also depended on the extent of Ca2+ wave propagation. We tested factors that influence the propagation of Ca2+ waves into the soma. Stimulating more synapses, increasing inositol trisphosphate concentration near the soma, and priming with physiological trains of action potentials all enhanced the amplitude and likelihood of evoking somatic Ca2+ waves. These results suggest that mGluR-mediated Ca2+ waves may regulate firing patterns of PFC pyramidal neurons engaged by working memory, particularly under conditions that favor the propagation of Ca2+ waves into the soma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhm075

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both cAMP and PKC signalling reduce the depolarizing current ICAN, which would further weaken persistent firing.

    “Both cAMP99 and PKC100 signalling reduce the depolarizing current ICAN, which would further weaken persistent firing89,101,102.”

    From Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function (2009) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Functional Significance section (page unavailable) suggests that sustained depolarization might help stabilize persistent activity, and the excitability results show that depolarization increased firing. The paper does not establish that the depolarizing current is ICAN or test whether cAMP or PKC reduces it; its proposed effect on persistent firing is speculative. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • With adequate InsP3 generation, waves of Ca2+ release are triggered, which can travel towards the soma and suppress neuronal firing by opening small-conductance, Ca2+-activated/K+ channels on the soma, leading to a current ISK.

    “With adequate InsP3 generation, waves of Ca2+ release are triggered, which can travel towards the soma and suppress neuronal firing by opening small-conductance, Ca2+-activated/K+ channels (SK channels) on the soma, leading to a current (ISK)89.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paxinos G, Watson C. 1998. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. [San Diego (CA)]: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagenston, A. M., Fitzpatrick, J. S., & Yeckel, M. F.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2007-06-14
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
407-423
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2122718922
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Dart Foundation
  • Kavli Foundation
  • Whitehall Foundation
  • Yale University (CT 06520)
  • Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (RL1AA017536)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH068789, R01MH067830, P50MH068789)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
metabotropic glutamate receptors, calcium waves, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, medial prefrontal cortex, neuronal excitability, firing patterns, working memory, inositol trisphosphate, calcium wave propagation, dendritic calcium signaling
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Calcium, Cells, Cultured, Feedback, Male, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate, Calcium Signaling, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review