The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood
Open accessAbstract
Regions of human ventral extrastriate visual cortex develop specializations for natural categories (e.g., faces) and cultural artifacts (e.g., words). In adults, category-based specializations manifest as greater neural responses in visual regions of the brain (e.g., fusiform gyrus) to some categories over others. However, few studies have examined how these specializations originate in the brains of children. Moreover, it is as yet unknown whether the development of visual specializations hinges on "increases" in the response to the preferred categories, "decreases" in the responses to nonpreferred categories, or "both." This question is relevant to a long-standing debate concerning whether neural development is driven by building up or pruning back representations. To explore these questions, we measured patterns of visual activity in 4-year-old children for 4 categories (faces, letters, numbers, and shoes) using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We report 2 key findings regarding the development of visual categories in the brain: 1) the categories "faces" and "symbols" doubly dissociate in the fusiform gyrus before children can read and 2) the development of category-specific responses in young children depends on cortical responses to nonpreferred categories that decrease as preferred category knowledge is acquired.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987
Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies
Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00343-4 · Cited by 973
Domain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049 · Cited by 776
Self-citationSynaptogenesis in human visual cortex—evidence for synapse elimination during normal development
Huttenlocher, P. R., de Courten, C., Garey, L. J., & Van der Loos, H. (1982) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(82)90379-2 · Cited by 745
The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015 · Cited by 727
Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.
Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.672 · Cited by 607
Golarai, G., Ghahremani, D. G., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Reiss, A., Eberhardt, J. L., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Grill-Spector, K. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1865 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Interactive Specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development?
Johnson, M. H. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003 · Cited by 722
Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3924 · Cited by 716
Self-citationRapid categorization of natural face images in the infant right hemisphere
de Heering, A., & Rossion, B. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.06564 · Cited by 434
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Monzalvo, K., & Dehaene, S. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004103 · Cited by 367
Self-citationWhat drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain?
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.004 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantlon, J. F., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., & Pelphrey, K. A.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-199
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2141313070
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhq078
- The paper
- Cantlon, J. F., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011). Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.