Cited by 207Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Reappraising the Ultimatum: an fMRI Study of Emotion Regulation and Decision Making

Open access
Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., van't Wout, M., Bonini, N., Sanfey, A. G.·2013·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Emotion regulation strategies provide a means by which to modulate our social behavior. In this study, we investigated the effect of using reappraisal to both up- and downregulate social decision making. After being instructed on how to use reappraisal, participants played the Ultimatum Game while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging and applied the strategies of upregulation (reappraising the proposer's intentions as more negative), down-regulation (reappraising the proposer's intentions as less negative), as well as a baseline "look" condition. As hypothesized, when reappraising, decision acceptance rates were altered, with a greater number of unfair offers accepted while down-regulating and a greater number of unfair offers rejected while upregulating, both relative to the baseline condition. At the neural level, during reappraisal, significant activations were observed in the inferior and middle frontal gyrus (MFG), in addition to the medial prefrontal cortex and cingulate gyrus for unfair offers only. Regulated decisions involved left inferior frontal gyrus for upregulation and MFG for down-regulation strategies, respectively. Importantly, the effects of emotion modulation were evident in posterior insula, with less activation for down-regulation and more activation for upregulation in these areas. Notably, we show for the first time that top-down strategies such as reappraisal strongly affect our socioeconomic decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhs028

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A neural circuit comprising the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and insula is involved in the unique processes of mindful emotion regulation.

    “In line with the above cited and other recent evidence [81, 83–85], we outline a neural circuit comprising the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the amygdala (A), and the insula (I) that are involved in the unique processes of mindful emotion regulation.”

    From Mindful emotion regulation: Exploring the neurocognitive mechanisms behind mindfulness (2015) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Reappraising Brain and Mentalizing section reports PFC and ACC recruitment during reappraisal, and Decision Making Can Be Influenced in Different Directions reports insula activity affected by the regulation strategies (page numbers unavailable). The Introduction mentions the amygdala only in describing emotion-regulation research generally. The paper studies reappraisal during an ultimatum game, not the proposed four-region circuit or processes unique to mindful emotion regulation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2003b. Spatial normalization using basis functions. In Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ, Frith C, Dolan RJ, Price C, Zeki S, et al., editors. Human brain function. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p 655--672.
  2. Brett M, Anton JL, Valabregue R, Poline J-B. 2002. Region of interest analysis using SPM toolbox. 8th International conference on functional mapping of the human brain; 2002 June 2--6; Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in Neuroimage. 16(2) [abstract].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., van't Wout, M., Bonini, N., & Sanfey, A. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
399-410
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2115247350
Cited by
207
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Provincia Autonoma di Trento
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, ultimatum game, social decision-making, fairness, up-regulation, downregulation, posterior insula, medial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, cingulate gyrus, top-down control
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Emotions, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review