Cited by 132Connexins and lens biologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Characterization of Panglial Gap Junction Networks in the Thalamus, Neocortex, and Hippocampus Reveals a Unique Population of Glial Cells

Open access
Griemsmann, Stephanie, Höft, Simon P., Bedner, Peter, Zhang, Jiong, von Staden, Elena, Beinhauer, Anna, Degen, Joachim, Dublin, Pavel +9 more·2015·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The thalamus plays important roles as a relay station for sensory information in the central nervous system (CNS). Although thalamic glial cells participate in this activity, little is known about their properties. In this study, we characterized the formation of coupled networks between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the murine ventrobasal thalamus and compared these properties with those in the hippocampus and cortex. Biocytin filling of individual astrocytes or oligodendrocytes revealed large panglial networks in all 3 gray matter regions. Combined analyses of mice with cell type-specific deletion of connexins (Cxs), semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blotting showed that Cx30 is the dominant astrocytic Cx in the thalamus. Many thalamic astrocytes even lack expression of Cx43, while in the hippocampus astrocytic coupling is dominated by Cx43. Deletion of Cx30 and Cx47 led to complete loss of panglial coupling, which was restored when one allele of either Cxs was present. Immunohistochemistry revealed a unique antigen profile of thalamic glia and identified an intermediate cell type expressing both Olig2 and Cx43. Our findings further the emerging concept of glial heterogeneity across brain regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhu157

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree of GFAP upregulation in reactive astrocytes often parallels the severity of injury, but this correlation is not always proportional, perhaps due to regional differences of astrocytes including basal GFAP content.

    “However, while the degree of GFAP upregulation in reactive astrocytes often parallels the severity of the injury6, this correlation is not always proportional, perhaps due to regional differences of astrocytes, including basal GFAP content13,14.”
  • Expression of some astrocyte proteins may change in reactive astrocytes, and some might be expressed by other cell types in specific brain regions.

    “In addition, the expression of some of these proteins may change in reactive astrocytes22 (Table 1), and some might be expressed by other cell types in specific brain regions13.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griemsmann, S., Höft, S. P., Bedner, P., Zhang, J., von Staden, E., Beinhauer, A., Degen, J., Dublin, P., Cope, D. W., Richter, N., Crunelli, V., Jabs, R., Willecke, K., Theis, M., Seifert, G., Kettenmann, H., & Steinhäuser, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Griemsmann, Stephanie
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2014-07-17
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
3420-3433
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2150090698
Cited by
132
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (71436, 202167)
  • Epilepsy Research UK
  • European Commission (202167)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TR 3, SFB 645, FP7-202167, STE552/4, SFB 645, B2, Wi270/29-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, ventrobasal thalamus, hippocampus, neocortex, connexins, Cx30, connexin 43, connexin knockout mice, glial heterogeneity, Olig2
MeSH terms
Connexin 30, Animals, Astrocytes, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Net, Oligodendroglia, Thalamus, Connexins, Connexin 43, Neocortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review