Cited by 61Hepatitis C virus researchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

Cost-effective screening for acute hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected men who have sex with men.

Open access
Linas, Benjamin P., Wong, Angela Y., Schackman, Bruce R., Kim, Arthur Y., Freedberg, Kenneth A.·2012·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We used a Monte Carlo computer simulation to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men who have sex with men. METHODS: One-time screening for prevalent HCV infection was performed at the time of enrollment in care, followed by either symptom-based screening, screening with liver function tests (LFTs), HCV antibody (Ab) screening, or HCV RNA screening in various combinations and intervals. We considered both treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG/RBV) alone and with an HCV protease inhibitor. Outcome measures were life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, direct medical costs, and cost-effectiveness, assuming a societal willingness to pay $100000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: All strategies increased life expectancy (from 0.49 to 0.94 life-months), quality-adjusted life expectancy (from 0.47 to 1.00 quality-adjusted life-months), and costs (from $1900 to $7600), compared with symptom-based screening. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening with 6-month LFTs and a 12-month HCV Ab test, compared with symptom-based screening, was $43 700/QALY (for PEG/RBV alone) and $57 800/QALY (for PEG/RBV plus HCV protease inhibitor). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening with 3-month LFTs, compared with 6-month LFTs plus a 12-month HCV Ab test, was $129 700/QALY (for PEG/RBV alone) and $229 900/QALY (for PEG/RBV plus HCV protease inhibitor). With HCV protease inhibitor-based therapy, screening with 6-month LFTs and a 12-month HCV Ab test was the optimal strategy when the HCV infection incidence was ≤1.25 cases/100 person-years. The 3-month LFT strategy was optimal when the incidence was >1.25 cases/100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for acute HCV infection in HIV-infected MSM prolongs life expectancy and is cost-effective. Depending on incidence, regular screening with LFTs, with or without an HCV Ab test, is the optimal strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cis382

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Screening for HCV in this setting is cost-effective.

    “Screening for HCV in this setting is cost-effective (238,239).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [238]

  • Regular screening of persons with HIV for HCV is cost-effective.

    “Because acute HCV infection acquisition among persons with HIV infection can occur, especially among MSM, and regular screening of those with HIV is cost-effective (238,239,1377), periodic HCV screening should be conducted (1378–1380).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [238]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linas, B. P., Wong, A. Y., Schackman, B. R., Kim, A. Y., & Freedberg, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Linas, Benjamin P.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
279-290
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2147821290
Cited by
61
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA027379)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K24AI062476, R37AI042006, U19AI066345, K01AI073193, P30AI060354)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Keywords
HIV infection, men who have sex with men, HCV screening, cost-effectiveness, liver function tests, HCV antibody testing, HCV RNA testing, pegylated interferon and ribavirin, HCV protease inhibitors, quality-adjusted life expectancy, HCV incidence, symptom-based screening, Monte Carlo simulation, HIV/HCV coinfection
MeSH terms
Adult, Antiviral Agents, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Hepatitis C, Humans, Immunoassay, Interferons, Life Expectancy, Liver Function Tests, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Protease Inhibitors, Ribavirin, HIV Infections, Health Care Costs, Homosexuality, Male, Hepatitis C Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review