Cited by 182Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

TISSUES 2.0: an integrative web resource on mammalian tissue expression

Open access
Palasca, Oana, Santos, Alberto, Stolte, Christian, Gorodkin, Jan, Jensen, Lars Juhl·2018·Database

Abstract

Abstract: Physiological and molecular similarities between organisms make it possible to translate findings from simpler experimental systems—model organisms—into more complex ones, such as human. This translation facilitates the understanding of biological processes under normal or disease conditions. Researchers aiming to identify the similarities and differences between organisms at the molecular level need resources collecting multi-organism tissue expression data. We have developed a database of gene–tissue associations in human, mouse, rat and pig by integrating multiple sources of evidence: transcriptomics covering all four species and proteomics (human only), manually curated and mined from the scientific literature. Through a scoring scheme, these associations are made comparable across all sources of evidence and across organisms. Furthermore, the scoring produces a confidence score assigned to each of the associations. The TISSUES database (version 2.0) is publicly accessible through a user-friendly web interface and as part of the STRING app for Cytoscape. In addition, we analyzed the agreement between datasets, across and within organisms, and identified that the agreement is mainly affected by the quality of the datasets rather than by the technologies used or organisms compared. Database URL: http://tissues.jensenlab.org/

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/database/bay003

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Target expression data was primarily extracted from GTEx, the Human Protein Atlas, UniProt and TISSUES.

    “Target expression data was primarily extracted from GTEx (12), the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) (13), UniProt and TISSUES (14).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palasca, O., Santos, A., Stolte, C., Gorodkin, J., & Jensen, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gorodkin, Jan
  • Jensen, Lars Juhl
Venue
Database
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
2018
ISSN
1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792450944
Cited by
182
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Innovationsfonden (0603-00320B)
  • Novo Nordisk (NNF14CC0001)
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (DFF-4005-00443, 4005-00443)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 14CC0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
tissue expression, transcriptomics, proteomics, literature curation, scoring system, confidence scores, model organisms, cross-species translation
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Organ Specificity, Species Specificity, Swine, Databases, Genetic, Mice, Rats, Data Curation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review