Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CD44 directs membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase to lamellipodia by associating with its hemopexin-like domain.

Mori, Hidetoshi, Tomari, Taizo, Koshikawa, Naohiko, Kajita, Masahiro, Itoh, Yoshifumi, Sato, Hiroshi, Tojo, Hideaki, Yana, Ikuo, Seiki, Motoharu·2002·The EMBO Journal

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/cdf411

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exosites outside the catalytic core domain of MMPs are less conserved and contribute to substrate selection and binding.

    “exosites that are regions outside the catalytic core domain of MMPs are less conserved and contribute to substrate selection and binding (27–29).”

    From Identification of amino acid residues in the MT-loop of MT1-MMP critical for its ability to cleave low-density lipoprotein receptor (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The section “The PEX domain of MT1-MMP binds directly to the stem region of CD44H” (page unavailable) shows that a domain outside the catalytic core binds CD44H; the discussion also says that domain is indispensable for CD44H shedding. Our copy does not establish that exosites are less conserved or that they generally govern substrate selection across MMPs. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Albrecht‐Buehler G (1977) The phagokinetic tracks of 3T3 cells. Cell, 11, 395–404. · DOI
  2. Alpaugh ML, Lee MC, Nguyen M, Deato M, Dishakjian L and Barsky SH (2000) Myoepithelial‐specific CD44 shedding contributes to the anti‐invasive and antiangiogenic phenotype of myoepithelial cells. Exp Cell Res, 261, 150–158. · DOI
  3. Atkinson SJ, Crabbe T, Cowell S, Ward RV, Butler MJ, Sato H, Seiki M, Reynolds JJ and Murphy G (1995) Intermolecular autolytic cleavage can contribute to the activation of progelatinase A by cell membranes. J Biol Chem, 270, 30479–30485. · DOI
  4. Bartolazzi A, Nocks A, Aruffo A, Spring F and Stamenkovic I (1996) Glycosylation of CD44 is implicated in CD44‐mediated cell adhesion to hyaluronan. J Cell Biol, 132, 1199–1208. · DOI
  5. Bourguignon LY, Lokeshwar VB, He J, Chen X and Bourguignon GJ (1992) A CD44‐like endothelial cell transmembrane glycoprotein (GP116) interacts with extracellular matrix and ankyrin. Mol Cell Biol, 12, 4464–4471.
  6. Bourguignon LY, Zhu H, Shao L, Zhu D and Chen YW (1999) Rho‐kinase (ROK) promotes CD44v(3,8‐10)–ankyrin interaction and tumor cell migration in metastatic breast cancer cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 43, 269–287. · DOI
  7. Brooks PC, Stromblad S, Sanders LC, von Schalscha TL, Aimes RT, Stetler‐Stevenson WG, Quigley JP and Cheresh DA (1996) Localization of matrix metalloproteinase MMP‐2 to the surface of invasive cells by interaction with integrin αvβ3. Cell, 85, 683–693. · DOI
  8. Cao J, Sato H, Takino T and Seiki M (1995) The C‐terminal region of membrane type matrix metalloproteinase is a functional transmembrane domain required for pro‐gelatinase A activation. J Biol Chem, 270, 801–805. · DOI
  9. Cowell S, Knauper V, Stewart ML, D'Ortho MP, Stanton H, Hembry RM, Lopez‐Otin C, Reynolds JJ and Murphy G (1998) Induction of matrix metalloproteinase activation cascades based on membrane‐type 1 matrix metalloproteinase: associated activation of gelatinase A, gelatinase B and collagenase 3. Biochem J, 331, 453–458. · DOI
  10. Dumin JA, Dickeson SK, Stricker TP, Bhattacharyya‐Pakrasi M, Roby JD, Santoro SA and Parks WC (2001) Pro‐collagenase‐1 (matrix metalloproteinase‐1) binds the α2β1 integrin upon release from keratinocytes migrating on type I collagen. J Biol Chem, 276, 29368–29374. · DOI
  11. Galvez BG, Matias‐Roman S, Albar JP, Sanchez‐Madrid F and Arroyo AG (2001) Membrane type 1‐matrix metalloproteinase is activated during migration of human endothelial cells and modulates endothelial motility and matrix remodeling. J Biol Chem, 276, 37491–37500. · DOI
  12. Goebeler M, Kaufmann D, Brocker EB and Klein CE (1996) Migration of highly aggressive melanoma cells on hyaluronic acid is associated with functional changes, increased turnover and shedding of CD44 receptors. J Cell Sci, 109, 1957–1964. · DOI
  13. Gunthert U et al. (1991) A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells. Cell, 65, 13–24. · DOI
  14. Henke CA, Roongta U, Mickelson DJ, Knutson JR and McCarthy JB (1996) CD44‐related chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, a cell surface receptor implicated with tumor cell invasion, mediates endothelial cell migration on fibrinogen and invasion into a fibrin matrix. J Clin Invest, 97, 2541–2552. · DOI
  15. Hiraoka N, Allen E, Apel IJ, Gyetko MR and Weiss SJ (1998) Matrix metalloproteinases regulate neovascularization by acting as pericellular fibrinolysins. Cell, 95, 365–377. · DOI
  16. Hotary K, Allen E, Punturieri A, Yana I and Weiss SJ (2000) Regulation of cell invasion and morphogenesis in a three‐dimensional type I collagen matrix by membrane‐type matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2 and 3. J Cell Biol, 149, 1309–1323. · DOI
  17. Huang W, Suzuki K, Nagase H, Arumugam S, Van Doren SR and Brew K (1996) Folding and characterization of the amino‐terminal domain of human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases‐1 (TIMP‐1) expressed at high yield in E. coli. FEBS Lett, 384, 155–161. · DOI
  18. Itoh Y, Kajita M, Kinoh H, Mori H, Okada A and Seiki M (1999) Membrane type 4 matrix metalloproteinase (MT4‐MMP, MMP‐17) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol‐anchored proteinase. J Biol Chem, 274, 34260–34266. · DOI
  19. Itoh Y, Takamura A, Ito N, Maru Y, Sato H, Suenaga N, Aoki T and Seiki M (2001) Homophilic complex formation of MT1‐MMP facilitates proMMP‐2 activation on the cell surface and promotes tumor cell invasion. EMBO J, 20, 4782–4793. · DOI
  20. Kajita M, Itoh Y, Chiba T, Mori H, Okada A, Kinoh H and Seiki M (2001) Membrane‐type 1 matrix metalloproteinase cleaves CD44 and promotes cell migration. J Cell Biol, 153, 893–904. · DOI
  21. Kalomiris EL and Bourguignon LY (1988) Mouse T lymphoma cells contain a transmembrane glycoprotein (GP85) that binds ankyrin. J Cell Biol, 106, 319–327. · DOI
  22. Kinoshita T, Sato H, Okada A, Ohuchi E, Imai K, Okada Y and Seiki M (1998) TIMP‐2 promotes activation of progelatinase A by membrane‐type 1 matrix metalloproteinase immobilized on agarose beads. J Biol Chem, 273, 16098–16103. · DOI
  23. Knauper V, Will H, Lopez‐Otin C, Smith B, Atkinson SJ, Stanton H, Hembry RM and Murphy G (1996) Cellular mechanisms for human procollagenase‐3 (MMP‐13) activation. Evidence that MT1‐MMP (MMP‐14) and gelatinase A (MMP‐2) are able to generate active enzyme. J Biol Chem, 271, 17124–17131. · DOI
  24. Kojima S, Itoh Y, Matsumoto S, Masuho Y and Seiki M (2000) Membrane‐type 6 matrix metalloproteinase (MT6‐MMP, MMP‐25) is the second glycosyl‐phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)‐anchored MMP. FEBS Lett, 480, 142–146. · DOI
  25. Koshikawa N, Giannelli G, Cirulli V, Miyazaki K and Quaranta V (2000) Role of cell surface metalloprotease MT1‐MMP in epithelial cell migration over laminin‐5. J Cell Biol, 148, 615–624. · DOI
  26. Ladeda V, Aguirre Ghiso JA and Bal de Kier Joffe E (1998) Function and expression of CD44 during spreading, migration and invasion of murine carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res, 242, 515–527. · DOI
  27. Lauffenburger DA and Horwitz AF (1996) Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell, 84, 359–369. · DOI · Paper page
  28. McCawley LJ and Matrisian LM (2000) Matrix metalloproteinases: multifunctional contributors to tumor progression. Mol Med Today, 6, 149–156. · DOI
  29. Mitchison TJ and Cramer LP (1996) Actin‐based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell, 84, 371–379. · DOI
  30. Morris A and Tannenbaum J (1980) Cytochalasin D does not produce net depolymerization of actin filaments in HEp‐2 cells. Nature, 287, 637–639. · DOI
  31. Murphy G and Gavrilovic J (1999) Proteolysis and cell migration: creating a path? Curr Opin Cell Biol, 11, 614–621. · DOI
  32. Nagase H and Woessner JF,Jr (1999) Matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem, 274, 21491–21494. · DOI
  33. Naot D, Sionov RV and Ish‐Shalom D (1997) CD44: structure, function and association with the malignant process. Adv Cancer Res, 71, 241–319. · DOI
  34. Okamoto I, Kawano Y, Tsuiki H, Sasaki J, Nakao M, Matsumoto M, Suga M, Ando M, Nakajima M and Saya H (1999) CD44 cleavage induced by a membrane‐associated metalloprotease plays a critical role in tumor cell migration. Oncogene, 18, 1435–1446. · DOI
  35. Ridley AJ, Paterson HF, Johnston CL, Diekmann D and Hall A (1992) The small GTP‐binding protein rac regulates growth factor‐induced membrane ruffling. Cell, 70, 401–410. · DOI
  36. Sato H, Takino T, Okada Y, Cao J, Shinagawa A, Yamamoto E and Seiki M (1994) A matrix metalloproteinase expressed on the surface of invasive tumour cells. Nature, 370, 61–65. · DOI
  37. Seiki M (1999) Membrane‐type matrix metalloproteinases. APMIS, 107, 137–143. · DOI
  38. Shi M, Dennis K, Peschon JJ, Chandrasekaran R and Mikecz K (2001) Antibody‐induced shedding of CD44 from adherent cells is linked to the assembly of the cytoskeleton. J Immunol, 167, 123–131. · DOI
  39. Sneath RJ and Mangham DC (1998) The normal structure and function of CD44 and its role in neoplasia. Mol Pathol, 51, 191–200. · DOI
  40. Stetler‐Stevenson WG, Aznavoorian S and Liotta LA (1993) Tumor cell interactions with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis. Annu Rev Cell Biol, 9, 541–573. · DOI
  41. Thomas L, Byers HR, Vink J and Stamenkovic I (1992) CD44H regulates tumor cell migration on hyaluronate‐coated substrate. J Cell Biol, 118, 971–977. · DOI
  42. Thomas L, Etoh T, Stamenkovic I, Mihm MC,Jr and Byers HR (1993) Migration of human melanoma cells on hyaluronate is related to CD44 expression. J Invest Dermatol, 100, 115–120. · DOI
  43. Tsukita S, Oishi K, Sato N, Sagara J and Kawai A (1994) ERM family members as molecular linkers between the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 and actin‐based cytoskeletons. J Cell Biol, 126, 391–401. · DOI
  44. Uekita T, Itoh Y, Yana I, Ohno H and Seiki M (2001) Cytoplasmic tail‐dependent internalization of membrane‐type 1 matrix metalloproteinase is important for its invasion‐promoting activity. J Cell Biol, 155, 1345–1356. · DOI
  45. Weber GF, Bronson RT, Ilagan J, Cantor H, Schmits R and Mak TW (2002) Absence of the CD44 gene prevents sarcoma metastasis. Cancer Res, 62, 2281–2286.
  46. Yonemura S, Hirao M, Doi Y, Takahashi N, Kondo T and Tsukita S (1998) Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins bind to a positively charged amino acid cluster in the juxta‐membrane cytoplasmic domain of CD44, CD43 and ICAM‐2. J Cell Biol, 140, 885–895. · DOI
  47. Yu Q and Stamenkovic I (1999) Localization of matrix metalloproteinase 9 to the cell surface provides a mechanism for CD44‐mediated tumor invasion. Genes Dev, 13, 35–48. · DOI
  48. Yu WH, Woessner JF,Jr, McNeish JD and Stamenkovic I (2002) CD44 anchors the assembly of matrilysin/MMP‐7 with heparin‐binding epidermal growth factor precursor and ErbB4 and regulates female reproductive organ remodeling. Genes Dev, 16, 307–323. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mori, H., Tomari, T., Koshikawa, N., Kajita, M., Itoh, Y., Sato, H., Tojo, H., Yana, I., & Seiki, M.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
21
Issue
15
Pages
3949-3959
ISSN
  • 0261-4189
  • 1460-2075
Cited by
296
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review