Cited by 341Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The physical activity paradox in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the contemporary Copenhagen General Population Study with 104 046 adults

Open access
Holtermann, Andreas, Schnohr, Peter, Nordestgaard, Børge Grønne, Marott, Jacob Louis·2021·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Leisure time physical activity associates with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, while these relationships for occupational physical activity are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that leisure time physical activity associates with reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality risk, while occupational physical activity associates with increased risks. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 104 046 women and men aged 20-100 years in the Copenhagen General Population Study with baseline measurements in 2003-2014 and median 10-year follow-up. Both leisure and occupational physical activity were based on self-report with four response categories. We observed 7913 (7.6%) MACE and 9846 (9.5%) deaths from all causes. Compared to low leisure time physical activity, multivariable adjusted (for lifestyle, health, living conditions, and socioeconomic factors) hazard ratios for MACE were 0.86 (0.78-0.96) for moderate, 0.77 (0.69-0.86) for high, and 0.85 (0.73-0.98) for very high activity; corresponding values for higher occupational physical activity were 1.04 (0.95-1.14), 1.15 (1.04-1.28), and 1.35 (1.14-1.59), respectively. For all-cause mortality, corresponding hazard ratios for higher leisure time physical activity were 0.74 (0.68-0.81), 0.59 (0.54-0.64), and 0.60 (0.52-0.69), and for higher occupational physical activity 1.06 (0.96-1.16), 1.13 (1.01-1.27), and 1.27 (1.05-1.54), respectively. Similar results were found within strata on lifestyle, health, living conditions, and socioeconomic factors, and when excluding individuals dying within the first 5 years of follow-up. Levels of the two domains of physical activity did not interact on risk of MACE (P = 0.40) or all-cause mortality (P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Higher leisure time physical activity associates with reduced MACE and all-cause mortality risk, while higher occupational physical activity associates with increased risks, independent of each other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab087

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher levels of occupational physical activity could be associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease events, the so-called physical activity paradox.

    “higher levels of occupational PA (i.e.related to the job) could actually be associated with a higher incidence of CVD events-the so-called 'physical activity paradox'.45,46”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. 33369898

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holtermann, A., Schnohr, P., Nordestgaard, B. G., & Marott, J. L.
Affiliations
  • National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK)
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Holtermann, Andreas
  • Marott, Jacob Louis
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2021-04-09
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
1499-1511
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W3140647705
Cited by
341
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 25
FWCI
32.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Capital Region of Copenhagen
  • The Danish Heart Foundation
  • The Danish Lung Association
  • Velux Foundation
  • Lundbeck Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
leisure-time physical activity, occupational physical activity, major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular risk, physical activity domains, Copenhagen General Population Study, socioeconomic factors, lifestyle
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Motor Activity, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review