Cited by 516Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersWorkplace Health and Well-being

Occupational Sitting and Health Risks

Open access
van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z., Wong, Jason, Chau, Josephine Y., van der Ploeg, Hidde P., Riphagen, Ingrid, Gilson, Nicholas D., Burton, Nicola W., Healy, Genevieve N. +7 more·2010·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Context Emerging evidence suggests that sedentary behavior (i.e., time spent sitting) may be negatively associated with health. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence on associations between occupational sitting and health risks.Evidence acquisition Studies were identified in March-April 2009 by literature searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PEDro, with subsequent related-article searches in PubMed and citation searches in Web of Science. Identified studies were categorized by health outcome. Two independent reviewers assessed methodologic quality using a 15-item quality rating list (score range 0-15 points, higher score indicating better quality). Data on study design, study population, measures of occupational sitting, health risks, analyses, and results were extracted.Evidence synthesis 43 papers met the inclusion criteria (21% cross-sectional, 14% case-control, 65% prospective); they examined the associations between occupational sitting and BMI (n=12); cancer (n=17); cardiovascular disease (CVD, n=8); diabetes mellitus (DM, n=4); and mortality (n=6). The median study-quality score was 12 points. Half the cross-sectional studies showed a positive association between occupational sitting and BMI, but prospective studies failed to confirm a causal relationship. There was some case-control evidence for a positive association between occupational sitting and cancer; however, this was generally not supported by prospective studies. The majority of prospective studies found that occupational sitting was associated with a higher risk of DM and mortality.Conclusions Limited evidence was found to support a positive relationship between occupational sitting and health risks. The heterogeneity of study designs, measures, and findings makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions at this time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dunstan D, Barr E, Healy GN et al. Television Viewing Time and Mortality: The AusDiab Study. Circulation 2010;121(3):384-91.
  2. Graff-Iversen S, Skurtveit S, Sorensen M, Nybo A. Hvilke sammenhenger finnes mellom kroppsarbeid og overvekt? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2001;22:2579-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Uffelen, J. G. Z., Wong, J., Chau, J. Y., van der Ploeg, H. P., Riphagen, I., Gilson, N. D., Burton, N. W., Healy, G. N., Thorp, A. A., Clark, B. K., Gardiner, P. A., Dunstan, D. W., Bauman, A., Owen, N., & Brown, W. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
379-388
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102665581
Cited by
516
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queensland Health
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (569861, 252977, 301200)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
occupational sitting, sedentary behavior, health risks, body mass index, cancer risk, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, mortality
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Neoplasms, Occupational Diseases, Occupations, Posture, Research Design, Risk Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review