Cited by 63Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Cholesterol levels in small LDL particles predict the risk of coronary heart disease in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study

Arsenault, B. J., Lemieux, I., Despres, J.-P., Wareham, N. J., Luben, R., Kastelein, J. J.P., Khaw, K.-T., Boekholdt, S. M.·2007·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in small and large LDL particles with risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective case-control study nested in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Cases were apparently healthy men and women aged 45-79 years who developed fatal or non-fatal CHD (n = 1035), and who were matched by age, gender, and enrollment time to 1920 controls who remained free of CHD. Electrophoretic characteristics of LDL particles were measured using 2-16% polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Concentrations of LDL-C(<255 A) were higher in cases than controls in men (1.34 +/- 0.88 vs. 1.15 +/- 0.80 mmol/L, P < 0.001) as well as in women (1.12 +/- 0.84 vs. 0.94 +/- 0.74 mmol/L, P < 0.001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for future CHD in men of the top tertile of LDL-C(<255 A) was 1.68 (95% CI, 1.33-2.13; P < 0.001) whereas in women the unadjusted OR was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.13-2.07; P < 0.001). However, after further adjustments for confounding variables, the association between LDL-C(<255 A) and CHD was no longer significant in men and in women. CONCLUSION: Cholesterol concentrations in different LDL subclasses show different relationships with CHD risk in this European cohort.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm390

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arsenault, B. J., Lemieux, I., Despres, J.-P., Wareham, N. J., Luben, R., Kastelein, J. J. P., Khaw, K.-T., & Boekholdt, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2007-10-17
Volume
28
Issue
22
Pages
2770-2777
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W1986470054
Cited by
63
References
53
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
small dense LDL, coronary heart disease risk, LDL particle size, polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis, EPIC-Norfolk cohort, sex differences in cardiovascular risk, confounding adjustment
MeSH terms
Aged, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Particle Size, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review