Cited by 394Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study)

Open access
Mont, Lluís, Bisbal, Felipe, Hernández-Madrid, Antonio, Pérez-Castellano, Nicasio, Viñolas, Xavier, Arenal, Angel, Arribas, Fernando, Fernández-Lozano, Ignacio +10 more·2014·European Heart Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is a highly effective therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) when compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT). No randomized studies have compared the two strategies in persistent AF. The present randomized trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of CA vs. ADT in treating persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to CA or ADT (excluding patients with long-standing persistent AF). Primary endpoint at 12-month follow-up was defined as any episode of AF or atrial flutter lasting >24 h that occurred after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints were any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 s, hospitalization, and electrical cardioversion. In total, 146 patients were included (aged 55 ± 9 years, 77% male). The ADT group received class Ic (43.8%) or class III drugs (56.3%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 69 of 98 patients (70.4%) in the CA group and 21 of 48 patients (43.7%) in the ADT group were free of the primary endpoint (P = 0.002), implying an absolute risk difference of 26.6% (95% CI 10.0-43.3) in favour of CA. The proportion of patients free of any recurrence (>30 s) was higher in the CA group than in the ADT group (60.2 vs. 29.2%; P < 0.001) and cardioversion was less frequent (34.7 vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF at 12-month follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT00863213 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00863213).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/eht457

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The complication rate of atrial fibrillation ablation is similar to the complication rate for antiarrhythmic drugs.

    “AF ablation, when performed in experienced centres by adequately trained teams, is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy in maintaining sinus rhythm, and the complication rate, though not negligible, is similar to the complication rate for antiarrhythmic drugs.585,717,1042”
  • Atrial fibrillation ablation, when performed in experienced centres by adequately trained teams, is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy in maintaining sinus rhythm.

    “AF ablation, when performed in experienced centres by adequately trained teams, is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy in maintaining sinus rhythm, and the complication rate, though not negligible, is similar to the complication rate for antiarrhythmic drugs.585,717,1042”
  • All available data point to lower recurrence rates after catheter ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with or without cardioversion in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

    “Fewer data are available reporting the effectiveness and safety of catheter ablation in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF, but all point to lower recurrence rates after catheter ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with or without cardioversion.185,717,[723][724][725][726]1039”
  • Fewer data are available reporting the effectiveness and safety of catheter ablation in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

    “Fewer data are available reporting the effectiveness and safety of catheter ablation in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF, but all point to lower recurrence rates after catheter ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with or without cardioversion.185,717,[723][724][725][726]1039”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mont, L., Bisbal, F., Hernández-Madrid, A., Pérez-Castellano, N., Viñolas, X., Arenal, A., Arribas, F., Fernández-Lozano, I., Bodegas, A., Cobos, A., Matía, R., Pérez-Villacastín, J., Guerra, J. M., Ávila, P., López-Gil, M., Castro, V., Arana, J. I., & Brugada, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • Hospital de Cruces (ES)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
501-507
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2151645874
Cited by
394
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
FWCI
17.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Biosense Webster
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
persistent atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs, class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs, class III antiarrhythmic agents, atrial flutter, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, sinus rhythm maintenance, electrical cardioversion, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Reoperation, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Early Termination of Clinical Trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review