Cited by 80Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of a standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncopes

Open access

Abstract

AIMS: Opinions differ regarding the effectiveness of cardiac pacing in patients affected by reflex syncope. We assessed a standardized guideline-based algorithm in different forms of reflex syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, multi-centre, observational study, patients aged >40 years, affected by severe unpredictable recurrent reflex syncopes, underwent carotid sinus massage (CSM), followed by tilt testing (TT) if CSM was negative, followed by implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) if TT was negative. Those who had an asystolic response to one of these tests received a dual-chamber pacemaker. POPULATION: 253 patients, mean age 70 ± 12 years, median 4 (3-6) syncopes, 89% without or with short prodromes. Of these patients, 120 (47%) received a pacemaker and 106 were followed up for a mean of 13 ± 7 months: syncope recurred in 10 (9%). The recurrence rate was similar in 61 CSM+ (11%), 30 TT+ (7%), and 15 ILR+ (7%) patients. The actuarial total syncope recurrence rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 6-12) at 1 year and 15% (95% CI, 10-20) at 2 years and was significantly lower than that observed in the group of 124 patients with non-diagnostic tests who had received an ILR: i.e. 22% (95% CI, 18-26) at 1 year and 37% (95% CI, 30-43) at 2 years (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: About half of older patients with severe recurrent syncopes without prodromes have an asystolic reflex for which cardiac pacing goes along with a low recurrence rate. The study supports the clinical utility of the algorithm for the selection of candidates to cardiac pacing in everyday clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01509534.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv069

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 80

Metadata

Authors
Brignole, M., Ammirati, F., Arabia, F., Quartieri, F., Tomaino, M., Ungar, A., Lunati, M., Russo, V., Del Rosso, A., & Gaggioli, G.
Affiliations
  • Presidio Ospedaliero (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio (IT)
  • Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
  • Ospedale di Bolzano (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • Ospedale Villa Scassi (IT)
Corresponding author
Brignole, Michele
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2015-03-29
Volume
36
Issue
24
Pages
1529-1535
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2174864566
Cited by
80
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
reflex syncope, cardiac pacing, dual-chamber pacemaker, elderly patients, carotid sinus massage, tilt table test, implantable loop recorder, syncope recurrence, diagnostic algorithm
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Humans, Male, Massage, Prospective Studies, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Treatment Outcome, Tilt-Table Test, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review