Cited by 451Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

New classification of haemodynamics of vasovagal syncope: beyond the VASIS classification Analysis of the pre-syncopal phase of the tilt test without and with nitroglycerin challenge

Open access
Brignole, M·2000·Europace

Abstract

We believe that the pattern of blood pressure response to tilt during the time preceding the development of the vasovagal reaction may provide adjunctive diagnostic information. A group of 101 consecutive patients affected by syncope of uncertain origin underwent passive tilt testing for 45 min at 60 degrees followed, if negative, by oral (sublingual) trinitroglycerin (TNG) 0.4 microg with continuation of the test for 20 min. Three main patterns were observed: the classic (vasovagal) syncope pattern was observed in 36 patients who, during the preparatory phase, had a rapid and full compensatory reflex adaptation to upright position, resulting in stabilization of their blood pressure values until abrupt onset of the vasovagal reaction; the dysautonomic (vasovagal) syncope pattern was observed in 47 patients in whom steady-state adaptation to upright position was not possible. There was thus a progressive fall in their blood pressure until the occurrence of a typical vasovagal reaction; the orthostatic intolerance pattern was observed in 18 patients in whom there was a progressive fall in blood pressure, similar to that of the dysautonomic group, but this was not followed by a clear vasovagal reaction. Compared with the classic, the dysautonomic patients were older, had a higher prevalence of co-morbidities, a very much shorter history of syncopal episodes, and a prevalence of mixed and vasodepressor forms of the VASIS classification. The patients with orthostatic intolerance had clinical characteristics similar to the dysautonmic group but they could not be classified according to the VASIS classification. In conclusion, in patients with syncope, a variety of abnormal responses is observed during tilt testing, suggesting that different syndromes can be diagnosed by the test. A more detailed, although still arbitrary, classification may form the basis of a number of future drug and pacemaker trials, as well as help towards a greater understanding of the different mechanisms of tilt-induced syncope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/eupc.1999.0064

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Sutton R, Petersen M, Brignole M, Raviele A, Menozzi C, Giani P. Proposed classification for tilt induced vasovagal syncope. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1992; 2: 180-3.
  2. Del Rosso A, Bartoli P, Bartoletti A, et al. Shortened head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in patients with unexplained syncope. Am Heart J 1998 ; 135: 564-70.
  3. Kurbaan AS, Franze ´n AC, Williams T, Kaddoura S, Sutton R. Usefulness of tilt test-induced patterns of heart rate and blood pressure using a two stage protocol with glyceryl trinitrate provocation in patients with syncope of unknown origin. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 665-70.
  4. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Gianfranchi L, Oddone D, Lolli G, Bertulla A. Carotid sinus massage, eye-ball compression test and head-up tilt test in patients with syncope of uncertain origin and in healthy control subjects. Am Heart J 1991; 122: 1644-51.
  5. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Bottoni N, et al. Mechanisms of syncope caused by transient bradycardia and the diag- nostic value of electrophysiologic testing and cardiovascular reflexivity maneuvers. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 273-78.
  6. Kapoor W, Karpf M, Wieand S, Peterson JR, Levey GS. A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 197-204.
  7. The Consensus Committee of the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure, and multiple system atrophy. Neurology 1996; 46: 1470.
  8. Krol R, Morady F, Flaker G, et al. Electrophysiologic testing in patients with unexplained syncope: clinical and non- invasive predictors of outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 358-63.
  9. Raviele A, Menozzi C, Brignole M, et al. Value of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin to assess the origin of unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 267- 72.
  10. Friedman DB, Jensen FB, Matzen S, Secher NH. Non- invasive blood pressure monitoring during head-up tilt test using the Penaz principle. Acta Anestesiol Scand 1990; 34: 519-22.
  11. Petersen MEV, Williams TR, Sutton R. A comparison of non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurements (Finapres) with intra-arterial pressure during prolonged head-up tilt. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 1647-54.
  12. Schutzman J, Jaeger F Maloney J, Fouad-Tarazi F. Head-up tilt and hemodynamic changes during orthostatic hypotension in patients with supine hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 454-61.
  13. Novak V, Novak P, Kus T, Nadeau R. Slow cardiovascular rhythms in tilt and syncope. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 12: 64-71.
  14. Glick G, Yu PN. Hemodynamic changes during spontaneous vasovagal reactions. Am J Med 1963; 34: 42-51.
  15. Gaggioli G, Bottoni N, Mureddu R, Foglia-Manzillo G, Mascioli G, Bartoli P, Musso G, Menozzi C, MD, Brignole M. Effects of chronic vasodilator therapy to enhance suscep- tibility to vasovagal syncope during upright tilt testing. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1092-4.
  16. Narkiewicz K, Somers V. Chronic orthostatic intolerance. Part of a spectrum of dysfunction in orthostatic cardio- vascular homeostasis? Circulation 1998; 98: 2105-7.
  17. Bou-Holaigh I, Rowe P, Kan J, Calkins H. The relationship between neurally mediated hypotension and chronic fatigue syndrome. JAMA 1995; 274: 961-7.
  18. Low P, Gilden J, Freeman R, Sheng KN, McElligott J. Efficacy of midodrine vs placebo in neurocardiogenic ortho- static hypotension. JAMA 1997; 277: 1046-51.
  19. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Lolli G, Bottoni N, Gaggioli G. Long-term outcome of paced and non-paced patients with severe carotid sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1039-43.
  20. Gaggioli G, Brignole M, Menozzi C, et al. A positive response to head-up tilt test predicts syncopal recurrence in carotid sinus syndrome patients treated with permanent pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 720-22.
  21. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Gianfranchi L, Lolli G, Bottoni N, Oddone D. A controlled trial of acute and long-term medical New VASIS classification 75 Europace, Vol. 2, January 2000 therapy in tilt-induced neurally-mediated syncope. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 339-42.
  22. Morillo C, Leitch J, Yee R, Klein G. A placebo-controlled trial of intravenous and oral disopyramide for prevention of neurally-mediated syncope induced by head-up tilt. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1843-8.
  23. Di Gerolamo E, Di Iorio C, Sabatini P, Leonzio I, Barsotti A. Effects of different treatments versus no treatment on neuro- cardiogenic syncope. Cardiologia 1998; 43: 833-7.
  24. Raviele A, Brignole M, Sutton R, et al Effect of etilefrine in preventing syncopal recurrence in patients with tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. A double-blind, randomized, placebo- controlled trial. Circulation 1999; 99: 1452-7.
  25. Ector H, Reybrouck T, Heidbuchel H, Van de Werf F. Tilt training: a new treatment for neurocardiogenic syncope (Abstr). Arch Mal Coeur Vaisseaux 1998; 91: 32.
  26. Mathias CJ. The classification and nomenclature of autonomic disorders: Ending chaos, restoring conflict, and hopefully achieving clarity. Clin Auton Res 1995; 5: 307- 10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brignole, M.
Corresponding author
Brignole, M
Venue
Europace
Published
2000-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
66-76
ISSN
1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119577113
Cited by
451
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
vasovagal syncope, trinitroglycerin, orthostatic intolerance, blood pressure response, autonomic dysfunction, syncope classification
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System, Echocardiography, Nitroglycerin, Hemodynamics, Humans, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Vasodilator Agents, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review