Cited by 41Heart rate and cardiovascular healthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Resting Heart Rate and Incident Heart Failure in Apparently Healthy Men and Women in the EPIC-Norfolk Study

Open access
Pfister, Roman, Michels, Guido, Sharp, Stephen J., Luben, Robert, Wareham, Nick J., Khaw, Kay-Tee·2012·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: Increasing levels of resting heart rate are associated with increased risk of developing hypertension and cardiovascular disease, and seem to play a role in the progression of heart failure. The shape of the association between resting heart rate and risk of developing heart failure has not been examined in healthy individuals of the general population. Methods and results: Hazard ratios (HRs) of heart failure comparing categories of resting heart rate [51–60 b.p.m. (reference), 61–70 b.p.m., 71–80 b.p.m., 81–90 b.p.m., and 91–100 b.p.m.] were calculated in apparently healthy men (9805) and women (12 321) aged 39–79 participating in the ‘European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition’ (EPIC) study in Norfolk. During a mean follow-up of 12.9 years, 1356 incident cases of heart failure occurred. In participants without potential heart rate-modifying medication, age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates of heart failure were 3.3, 3.7, 4.0, 5.1, and 5.5 per 1000 person-years for increasing categories of resting heart rate; compared with the reference category, HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for increasing categories of resting heart rate were 1.08 (0.88–1.34), 1.17 (0.94–1.46), 1.39 (1.08–1.79), and 1.42 (1.00–2.03), respectively, in multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, prevalent diabetes, cholesterol concentration, social class, educational level, smoking, and physical activity. Within the reference range of resting heart rate (50–100 b.p.m.) each 10 b.p.m. increase was associated with an 11% increase in hazard of heart failure in multivariable analysis. The results did not change materially after adjusting for myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease events during follow up (1.12, 1.06–1.18). Conclusion: Resting heart rate shows a graded association with hazard of heart failure in apparently healthy men and women which is not mediated by coronary heart disease. Further study is needed to examine the underlying mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs104

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The percentage of heart rates above 90-100 bpm in population studies ranges from 2.1 to 4.6%.

    “The percentage of heart rates above 90–100 bpm in population studies ranges from 2.1 to 4.6%.11,13–15”

    From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dargie HJ, McMurray JJ. Diagnosis and management of heart failure. BMJ 1994; 308:321-328.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfister, R., Michels, G., Sharp, S. J., Luben, R., Wareham, N. J., & Khaw, K.-T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge , Cambridge ,
Corresponding author
Pfister, Roman
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2012-10-01
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
1163-1170
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2092318115
Cited by
41
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • University of Cambridge
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resting heart rate, heart failure, incident heart failure, cardiovascular risk, general population, EPIC-Norfolk study, hypertension, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular disease progression, sex differences, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, physical activity, smoking, educational attainment, social class, diabetes mellitus, cholesterol, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular morbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review