Cited by 21Flood Risk Assessment and ManagementDisaster Response and ManagementPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Impact of flooding on health-related quality of life in England: results from the National Study of Flooding and Health

Open access
Robin, Charlotte, Beck, Charles, Armstrong, Ben, Waite, Thomas David, Rubin, G James, English National Study of Flooding and Health Study Group, Waite, Thomas David, Beck, Charles R +15 more·2020·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: Flooding can have extensive effects on the health and wellbeing of affected communities. The impact of flooding on psychological morbidity has been established; however, the wider impacts of flooding exposure, including on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), have not been described. Methods: Using data from the English National Study of Flooding and Health cohort, HRQoL 2 and 3 years post-flooding was assessed with the EuroQol Group EQ-5D-5L tool. Associations between exposure groups (flooding and disruption from flooding) and HRQoL were assessed, using ordinal and linear regression, adjusting for a priori confounders. Results: For both 2 and 3 years post-flooding, the median HRQoL scores were lower in the flooded and disrupted groups, compared with unaffected respondents. A higher proportion of flooded and disrupted respondents reported HRQoL problems in most dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L, compared with unaffected respondents. In year 2, independent associations between exposure to flooding and experiencing anxiety/depression [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.7; 95% CI 4.6–13.5], problems with usual activities (aOR 5.3; 95% CI 2.5–11.9) and pain/discomfort (aOR 2.4; 95% CI 1.5–3.9) were identified. These problems persisted 3 years post-flooding; associations between exposure to flooding and experiencing anxiety/depression (aOR 4.3; 95% CI 2.5–7.7), problems with usual activities (aOR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5–6.1) and pain/discomfort (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5–4.2) were identified. Conclusions: Exposure to flooding and disruption from flooding significantly reduces HRQoL. These findings extend our knowledge of the impacts of flooding on health, with implications for multi-agency emergency response and recovery plans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa049

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three years after a flood disaster, directly affected people have severely worse anxiety/depression-related quality of life than unaffected people (OR=4.30; 95% CI 2.48-7.72).

    “Even three years after a flood disaster, the healthrelated quality of life of those directly affected by flooding is severely restricted in comparison with unaffected persons with regard to anxiety/depression (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30; 95% confidence interval [2,48; 7,72]) (10).”

    From The effects of climate change on mental health (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robin, C., Beck, C., Armstrong, B., Waite, T. D., Rubin, G. J., English National Study of Flooding and Health Study Group, Waite, T. D., Beck, C. R., Amlôt, R., Kovats, S., Armstrong, B., Leonardi, G., Rubin, G. J., Oliver, I., Waite, T. D., Beck, C. R., Amlôt, R., Kovats, S., Armstrong, B., Leonardi, G., Rubin, G. J., Oliver, I., & Oliver, I.
Affiliations
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Field Epidemiology, Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
Corresponding author
Robin, Charlotte
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2020-03-30
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
942-948
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W3013624550
Cited by
21
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Units
  • NIHR
  • Evaluation of Interventions at the University of Bristol
  • Public Health England
  • PHE
  • Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London
  • Environmental Change and Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • NHS
  • Department of Health and Social Care
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
floods, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, activity limitation, pain and discomfort, EQ-5D-5L, disaster recovery, emergency planning
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, England, Humans, Quality of Life, Floods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review