Cited by 29Digital Mental Health InterventionsEating Disorders and BehaviorsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Stakeholders’ perspectives on online interventions to improve mental health in eating disorder patients and carers in Germany

Open access
Schmidt-Hantke, Juliane, Vollert, Bianka, Hagner, Franziska, Beintner, Ina, Hütter, Kristian, Nitsch, Martina, Jacobi, Corinna, Waldherr, Karin·2021·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders are causing severe consequences for those affected as well as a high burden for their carers. Although there is a substantial need for psychological assistance, different factors are hindering access to support. Internet-based interventions can help to overcome these barriers. To date, there is only little knowledge on attitudes of potential users, facilitators (e.g. psychologists) and decision makers (e.g. health insurances) regarding these interventions. Methods: We conducted focus groups with potential users (N = 30) and semi-structured interviews with potential decision makers (N = 4). Potential facilitators (N = 41) participated in an online survey. Stakeholders’ experiences, attitudes, and their needs regarding Internet-based interventions for eating disorder patients and carers were assessed. Furthermore, hindering and fostering factors related to reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance were analyzed. Results: About two-thirds of the participating facilitators have heard or read about Internet-based interventions in general. In contrast, the other stakeholders mentioned to have no or little experience with such interventions. Factors like anonymity, availability and cost-effectiveness were seen as major advantages. Also disadvantages, e.g. lack of personal contact, limitations by disease severity and concerns on data safety, were mentioned. Stakeholders stated the need for interventions which are usable, evidence-based, tailored and provide personal support. Conclusion: Stakeholders considered Internet-based programmes to have more advantages than disadvantages. Effort should be put in providing systematic education to address prejudices. When offering an online intervention, stakeholders’ needs, as well as a continuous evaluation and adaptation, have to be taken into account.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckab057

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphone-delivered interventions are flexible in terms of time and place.

    “Such interventions are flexible in terms of time and place, can be offered in different languages, thus reaching a high number of people, and their anonymous usage might reduce the fear of mental health stigma (Hilty et al., 2018; Burchert et al., 2019; Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021).”

    From Smartphone-delivered mental health care interventions for refugees: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021

    The Results (Attitudes; page unavailable) report that stakeholders considered Internet-based interventions flexible in location and time. The paper mentions mobile-phone use, but it does not specifically establish this finding for smartphone-delivered interventions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smartphone-delivered interventions have the potential to directly address some of the strongest barriers to help-seeking in refugee populations.

    “Smartphone-delivered interventions like applications (‘apps’) or internet-based interventions that can be implemented on smartphones have the potential to directly address some of the strongest barriers to help-seeking in refugee populations.”

    From Smartphone-delivered mental health care interventions for refugees: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021

    The Introduction says Internet-delivered interventions may reduce barriers such as limited access, stigma and long waits; the Discussion notes their accessibility and potential to reach underserved people. The paper concerns eating-disorder patients and carers in Germany, however, and does not establish that these are the strongest help-seeking barriers in refugee populations. It discusses Internet-based programmes suitable for mobile devices, not specifically smartphone apps. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smartphone-delivered interventions can be offered in different languages, thus reaching a high number of people.

    “Such interventions are flexible in terms of time and place, can be offered in different languages, thus reaching a high number of people, and their anonymous usage might reduce the fear of mental health stigma (Hilty et al., 2018; Burchert et al., 2019; Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021).”

    From Smartphone-delivered mental health care interventions for refugees: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021

    The Results (Attitudes) describe internet-based interventions as using widely available technology, and the Discussion (Principal Findings) says they can reach underserved populations. The paper also discusses a mobile version in Results (Characteristics), but the passages do not say interventions can be offered in different languages or that this is why they reach more people. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Anonymous usage of smartphone-delivered interventions might reduce the fear of mental health stigma.

    “Such interventions are flexible in terms of time and place, can be offered in different languages, thus reaching a high number of people, and their anonymous usage might reduce the fear of mental health stigma (Hilty et al., 2018; Burchert et al., 2019; Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021).”

    From Smartphone-delivered mental health care interventions for refugees: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Schmidt-Hantke et al., 2021

    In Results > Attitudes (page not provided), stakeholders described anonymity as an advantage of Internet-based interventions because it could help overcome fear of stigmatization. The source supports the proposed stigma benefit, but it does not establish that benefit specifically for smartphone-delivered interventions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Klasen M, Knaevelsrud C, Böttche M. The therapeutic alliance in internet-based therapy procedures: an overview. Nervenarzt 2013; 84: 823– 31. 23212735

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt-Hantke, J., Vollert, B., Hagner, F., Beintner, I., Hütter, K., Nitsch, M., Jacobi, C., & Waldherr, K.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Fachhochschule Wiener Neustadt (AT)
Corresponding author
Schmidt-Hantke, Juliane
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
31
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
i80-i87
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W3181207793
Cited by
29
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Union’s Horizon 2020 (634757)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
eating disorders, online intervention, online psychological intervention, caregivers, stakeholder perspectives, access barriers, facilitators, data privacy, cost-effectiveness, anonymity, mental health
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Caregivers, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review