Cited by 331Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyBehavioral Health and Interventions

Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers

Open access
Hammond, David, Fong, Geoffrey T., McDonald, Paul W., Brown, K. Stephen, Cameron, Roy·2004·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the impact of graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels. METHODS: We used a longitudinal telephone survey of 616 adult smokers. RESULTS: Approximately one fifth of participants reported smoking less as a result of the labels; only 1% reported smoking more. Although participants reported negative emotional responses to the warnings including fear (44%) and disgust (58%), smokers who reported greater negative emotion were more likely to have quit, attempted to quit, or reduced their smoking 3 months later. Participants who attempted to avoid the warnings (30%) were no less likely to think about the warnings or engage in cessation behavior at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers should not be reluctant to introduce vivid or graphic warnings for fear of adverse outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1442

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One observational study revealed that Canadian smokers who avoided pictorial warnings were equally likely to think about the warnings or engage in cessation behaviour than those who did not attempt to avoid the warnings.

    “One observational study revealed that Canadian smokers who avoided pictorial warnings were equally likely to think about the warnings or engage in cessation behaviour than those who did not attempt to avoid the warnings.93”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Ad Hoc Committee of the Canadian Tobacco Industry. A Canadian tobacco industry presentation on smoking and health: a presentation to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Welfare and Social Affairs. House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Welfare and Social Affairs. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, 5June1969; 1579–1689. Available from the Library and Archives Canada (Finding Aid: 14-27).
  2. [11]Fong GT, Cameron AJR, Brown KS, Campbell HS, Zanna MP, Murnaghan D. Effects of the Canadian graphic warning labels among high school students: a quasi-experimental longitudinal survey. Paper presented at: 2002 National Conference on Tobacco or Health; 20November2002; San Francisco, Calif.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., McDonald, P. W., Brown, K. S., & Cameron, R.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2004-08
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
1442-1445
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2119877812
Cited by
331
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA 90955, R01CA090955)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
graphic warning labels, cigarette warning labels, smoking behavior, smoking cessation, fear, disgust, tobacco control
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Audiovisual Aids, Avoidance Learning, Fear, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Negativism, Ontario, Product Labeling, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Nicotiana, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review