Cited by 33School Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Barriers and facilitators to the nationwide dissemination of the Dutch school-based obesity prevention programme DOiT

Open access
van Nassau, Femke, Singh, Amika S., Broekhuizen, Doris, van Mechelen, Willem, Brug, Johannes, Chinapaw, Mai J. M.·2016·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article describes the barriers and facilitating factors to the adoption, implementation and continuation of the Dutch Obesity Intervention in Teenagers (DOiT) programme in the Netherlands. METHODS: We evaluated the adoption, implementation and continuation of the programme at 20 voluntary prevocational schools, which adopted the programme. Interviews were conducted with DOiT coordinators and/or teachers (n = 44) at the end of the first and second school year of the 2-year implementation period. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were coded by two researchers independently. Identified barriers and facilitating factors were categorized into four groups: (i) organizational factors, (ii) individual factors, (iii) characteristics of the programme and (iv) characteristics of the implementation strategy. RESULTS: Teachers and DOiT coordinators identified various implementation barriers (e.g. lack of planning, other urgent unforeseen priorities, no plan to cope with teacher turnover and high teacher workload) as well as facilitating factors (e.g. involvement of DOiT coordinator and support from the DOiT office, sufficient communication and collaboration between teachers, strong teacher motivation and flexibility of the programme). CONCLUSION: Overall, DOiT implementers were satisfied with the compatibility, layout, content and potential for tailoring the programme. Barriers for successful implementation were mainly at the school and teacher level. Findings of this study can be used for further improvement of the DOiT programme and for the development and improvement of other health promotion programmes in the school setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckv251

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Nassau, F., Singh, A. S., Broekhuizen, D., van Mechelen, W., Brug, J., & Chinapaw, M. J. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-02-11
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
611-616
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2257740909
Cited by
33
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity prevention, school health promotion, implementation barriers, enabling factors, teacher workload, teacher turnover, teacher motivation, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Netherlands, School Health Services, Program Evaluation, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review