Cited by 55Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

The effect of gender and body composition method on the apparent decline in lean mass-adjusted resting metabolic rate with age

Roubenoff, R., Hughes, V. A., Dallal, G. E., Nelson, M. E., Morganti, C., Kehayias, J. J., Singh, M. A. F., Roberts, S.·2000·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Declining resting energy expenditure (REE) is a hallmark of normal aging, but the cause of this decline remains controversial. Some, but not all, studies have shown that the decline in REE with age is eliminated after adjustment for fat-free mass (FFM). METHODS: We examined the effect of four body composition methods used to assess FFM (underwater weighing [UWW], bioimpedance analysis [BIA], tritium dilution, and total body potassium [TBK]) on the relationship between REE and age in 30 healthy men and 101 healthy women aged 18 to 87 years. RESULTS: The decline in REE with age was significant in women (-80.3 kJ/d/y, p < .004) but not in men (-46.9 kJ/d/y, p = .328). After adjustment for FFM, the decline in REE with age persisted when FFM was measured by BIA, UWW, or tritium dilution, but no decline was seen when TBK was used to adjust for FFM. In both women and men, fat mass was significantly associated with REE after adjusting for age and FFM. CONCLUSION: It is the decline in cell mass with age, detectable by TBK but not by other methods, rather than any metabolic alteration, that explains the decline in FFM-adjusted REE with age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/55.12.m757

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roubenoff, R., Hughes, V. A., Dallal, G. E., Nelson, M. E., Morganti, C., Kehayias, J. J., Singh, M. A. F., & Roberts, S.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Roubenoff, R.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
M757-M760
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W1992399507
Cited by
55
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21ag015797-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-15797)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
resting energy expenditure, aging, fat-free mass, lean body mass, body composition measurement, total body potassium, bioelectrical impedance analysis, underwater weighing, sex differences, fat mass, energy metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Body Composition, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rest, Sex Characteristics, Thinness, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review