Cited by 217Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Health, and Disability

Impact of Caregiving on Health and Quality of Life: A Comparative Population-Based Study of Caregivers for Elderly Persons and Noncaregivers

Ho, S. C., Chan, A., Woo, J., Chong, P., Sham, A.·2009·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of caregiving on the health status and quality of life (QOL) of primary informal caregivers (PCGs) of elderly care recipients in Hong Kong. A total of 246 PCGs and 492 matched noncaregiver (NCG) controls were identified in a population-based cross-sectional study through random telephone dialing. Their health status and QOL were assessed based on structured questionnaires and Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Multiple conditional logistic regression analysis showed that compared with NCGs, PCGs had significantly increased risks for reporting worse health, more doctor visits, anxiety and depression, and weight loss. Female PCGs were more likely to report chronic diseases, symptoms, and insomnia. PCGs, particularly women, had significantly lower scores in all eight domains of SF-36 Health Survey. High caregiver burden score (Zarit Burden Scale) was positively associated with adverse physical and psychological health and poorer QOL. The results indicate that PCGs, particularly women, had an adverse physical and psychological health profile and poorer QOL compared with NCGs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glp034

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informal caregivers have worse health, more medical consultations, anxiety and depression, and lower quality of life than those who do not provide such care.

    “Primary informal caregivers have worse health profile, more medical consultations, anxiety and depression, weight loss, and lower quality of life compared with their counterparts [6].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, S. C., Chan, A., Woo, J., Chong, P., & Sham, A.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Lingnan University (HK)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2009-04-07
Volume
64A
Issue
8
Pages
873-879
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2096800364
Cited by
217
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Lingnan (Lingnan University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Health Care and Promotion Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
informal caregivers, primary caregivers, caregiver burden, quality of life, health status, anxiety, depression, insomnia, weight loss, chronic disease, sex differences, Hong Kong
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Logistic Models, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review