Cited by 36Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Resistance training and pioglitazone lead to improvements in muscle power during voluntary weight loss in older adults

Open access
Marsh, A. P., Kyla Shea, M., Vance Locke, R. M., Miller, M. E., Isom, S., Miller, G. D., Nicklas, B. J., Lyles, M. F. +2 more·2013·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in older adults is increasing but concerns exist about the effect of weight loss on muscle function. Demonstrating that muscle strength and power are not adversely affected during "intentional" weight loss in older adults is important given the wide-ranging negative health effects of excess adiposity. METHODS: Participants (N = 88; age = 70.6 ± 3.6 years; body mass index = 32.8 ± 4.5 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups: pioglitazone or placebo and resistance training (RT) or no RT, while undergoing intentional weight loss via a hypocaloric diet. Outcomes were leg press power and isometric knee extensor strength. Analysis of covariance, controlling for baseline values, compared follow-up means of power and strength according to randomized groups. RESULTS: Participants lost an average of 6.6% of initial body mass, and significant declines were observed in fat mass, lean body mass, and appendicular lean body mass. Compared with women not randomized to RT, women randomized to RT had significant improvements in leg press power (p < .001) but not in knee extensor strength (p = 0.12). No significant differences between groups in change in power or strength from baseline were detected in men (both p > .25). A significant pioglitazone-by-RT interaction for leg press power was detected in women (p = .006) but not in men (p = .88). CONCLUSIONS: In older overweight and obese adults, a hypocaloric weight loss intervention led to significant declines in lean body mass and appendicular lean body mass. However, in women assigned to RT, leg power significantly improved following the intervention, and muscle strength or power was not adversely effected in the other groups. Pioglitazone potentiated the effect of RT on muscle power in women but not in men; mechanisms underlying this sex effect remain to be determined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/gls258

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of loss or blunted increase of lean mass with weight loss on physical performance are offset by improvements in total and regional adiposity.

    “as we previously showed, any effects of the loss or blunted increase of lean mass with weight loss on physical performance is offset by improvements in total and regional adiposity (22,45).”

    From Effects of resistance training with and without caloric restriction on physical function and mobility in overweight and obese older adults: a randomized controlled trial (2015) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion and Notes (page unavailable) report that fat and lean mass fell while muscle strength and power generally did not decline. The paper only speculates that reduced fat mass may have helped offset effects of lean-mass loss; it does not establish that total and regional adiposity improvements offset effects on physical performance. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, A. P., Kyla Shea, M., Vance Locke, R. M., Miller, M. E., Isom, S., Miller, G. D., Nicklas, B. J., Lyles, M. F., Carr, J. J., & Kritchevsky, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2013-01-04
Volume
68
Issue
7
Pages
828-836
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2149965016
Cited by
36
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America
  • Wake Forest University (P30 AG21332)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG-21332, P30AG028740, P30AG021332)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, pioglitazone, muscle power, older adults, obesity, hypocaloric diet, quadriceps strength, lean body mass, sex differences
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Aged, Aging, Body Composition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Obesity, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Thiazolidinediones, Overweight, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review