Cited by 59Personality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

Personality and Perceived Health in Older Adults: The Five Factor Model in Primary Care

Chapman, Benjamin P., Duberstein, Paul R., Sörensen, Silvia, Lyness, Jeffrey M.·2006·The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

Abstract

Responses to specific questions tapping perceived health are associated with morbidity, mortality, and the use of health services, yet there has been little research on their personality correlates. We examined the associations between Five Factor Model personality traits and responses to four items extracted from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 in 266 primary care patients who were 65 years of age or older. Multivariate analyses controlling for age, gender, depressive symptoms, and physical disease burden showed that having a higher Neuroticism score was associated with worse perceived health in response to all items except “I am as healthy as anybody I know.” Having a lower Extraversion score was associated with worse perceived health in response to the item “I expect my health to get worse.” We discuss implications for understanding personality influences on morbidity, mortality, and health services utilization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/61.6.p362

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Sörensen, S., & Lyness, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Chapman, Benjamin P.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
P362-P365
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2155644142
Cited by
58
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Rochester
  • National Institutes of Health (5k07mh001113-05)
  • Medical Center, University of Rochester
  • National Institute on Aging (K01AG022072, L30 AG031021)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K07MH01113, T32MH073452)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality traits, health perception, older adults, neuroticism, extraversion, primary care, health-related quality of life, health care utilization, morbidity and mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Attitude to Health, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review