Cited by 86Personality Traits and PsychologyChronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth, psychology, and well-being

Personality and Medical Illness Burden Among Older Adults in Primary Care

Open access
Chapman, Benjamin P., Lyness, Jeffrey M., Duberstein, Paul·2007·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between Five Factor Model personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to experience, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness) and physician-quantified aggregate morbidity in a sample of older adults in primary care. METHODS: A total of 449 primary care patients, ranging in age from 65 to 97 years (75 +/- 6.9 (mean +/- standard deviation)), completed the Neo-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and extensive interviews. A physician-investigator completed the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), a well-validated measure of aggregate morbidity based on a review of medical records. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses demonstrated that all five domains of the NEO-FFI were associated with CIRS scores. Multivariate regression controlling for age, gender, education, depression, smoking, hypertension, total cholesterol, alcohol or substance misuse, and other personality traits showed that greater Conscientiousness was independently associated with lower CIRS scores (beta = -0.10, t(435) = -1.96, p = .05). Other independent predictors of less morbidity were younger age, absence of hypertension, and lower levels of depression. CONCLUSION: Our results point toward the necessity of considering Conscientiousness and other personality traits in studies of risk factors for aggregate morbidity. More detailed characterization of at-risk populations will increase the likelihood of constructing informed and effective prevention, intervention, and policy initiatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3180313975

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, B. P., Lyness, J. M., & Duberstein, P.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Chapman, Benjamin P.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2007-04
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
277-282
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050252960
Cited by
86
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh061429-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG023956, L30 AG031021)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K24MH71509, K24MH072712, R01 MH-61429, R01 MH-061429, K24MH071509, T32MH073452)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
personality traits, Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness, neuroticism, older adults, primary care, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, depression, hypertension
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Depression, Disease Susceptibility, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Interview, Psychological, Male, Medical Records, Neurotic Disorders, New York, Personality, Personality Inventory, Primary Health Care, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking, Social Behavior, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review