Cited by 378Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 41 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Health Implications of Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China

Open access
Chen, F., Liu, G.·2012·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Caring for grandchildren is a common and normative experience for many Chinese grandparents. This study investigates the influence of child care provision on older adults' health trajectories in China. METHOD: Using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1991, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2004, and 2006), we apply growth curve models to examine the effect of living arrangements and intensity of caregiving for grandchildren on older adults' health trajectories. We use propensity score weighting to take into account potential selection bias. RESULTS: Grandparents living in skipped-generation households do not suffer from a deficit in self-reported health, particularly when they have higher family income. Those living in three-generation households experience a slightly more rapid health decline than older adults who live independently, although the paternal grandparents in this type of household have a significant health advantage over the maternal grandparents. Among the coresiding grandparents, high intensity care for younger grandchildren accelerates health declines, whereas a lighter level of care has a protective effect. In addition, rural grandparents and grandfathers engaging in high intensity care have worse self-reported health on average. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that grandchild care does not have a universally beneficial or detrimental effect on health, but rather its effect depends on the form and level of caregiving and is further shaped by individual characteristics, as well as normative and structural contexts.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study asks whether caring for grandchildren helps or harms older adults’ health in China, using longitudinal data from 1991 to 2006. It finds that the health effect is not uniform: it depends on living arrangement, caregiving intensity, gender, rural/urban residence, and family income.

Key findings

  • Skipped-generation grandparents did not show a self-reported health deficit, and higher family income appeared to buffer them; the interaction between skipped-generation living and high income was 0.14.
  • Three-generation coresidence was linked to a slightly faster health decline, but paternal grandparents had better average health and slower decline than maternal grandparents in that arrangement.
  • Among coresiding grandparents, high-intensity care for young grandchildren accelerated health decline, while light care had a protective association; high-intensity care was defined as 15 or more hours per week.
  • Grandfathers and rural grandparents providing high-intensity care had worse self-reported health on average; the negative intensive-care coefficient of 0.09 was offset for urban grandparents by an interaction of −0.11. Grandfathers averaged 7 caregiving hours per week versus 21 for grandmothers.

Methods

  • Data came from six China Health and Nutrition Survey waves (1991, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2004, 2006), selecting adults aged 55 and older and yielding 14,954 person-year records.
  • The main analysis used growth curve models within a hierarchical linear modeling framework to estimate within-person and between-person health trajectories, with self-rated health reverse-coded so higher values meant better health.
  • Grandparenting was measured first by living arrangement (noncoresidence, skipped-generation, three-generation, paternal/maternal) and then by caregiving intensity among coresiding grandparents with grandchildren aged 0–6 (high, low, no care). Propensity score weighting was used to address selection into coresidence and caregiving.

Limitations

  • The paper states that child care measurement was limited to very young grandchildren, that only coresiding grandparents were examined, and that noncoresiding caregivers and care for nonfamily members were not studied.
  • It also states that self-reported health was the only consistently available health measure across waves, that ADL results were less robust, and that endogeneity and selectivity are difficult to resolve fully despite propensity score weighting and lagged measures.
  • The text makes evident that the CHNS sample is not nationally representative, although the authors note prior work suggesting its household and individual characteristics reflect national averages.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbr132

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 41 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 37 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 37
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
56 of 56
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coresidence with grandchildren and intensive child care provision are selective in nature, as compared with occasional babysitting.

    “Coresidence with grandchildren and intensive child care provision are most likely to be selective in nature (as compared with occasional babysitting).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The measures of potential needs for child care by adult children are important predictors of grandparents' engagement in child care and do not have direct effects on grandparents' health.

    “The last two measures are particularly important because we consider them important predictors of whether grandparents are engaged in child care or not, while at the same time, the measures should not have direct effects on grandparents' health.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In rural China, parents can be particularly dependent on their children for financial security in old age.

    “In rural China, parents can be particularly dependent on their children for financial security in old age.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Health change usually does not take place suddenly but is likely a gradual, interactive, and cumulative process.

    “Nonetheless, health change usually does not take place suddenly but is likely a gradual, interactive, and cumulative process.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coresidence with children and grandchildren does not happen at random.

    “In addition, coresidence with children and grandchildren does not happen at random.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The residuals and random effects in the growth curve models are normally distributed.

    “with eti assumed to be independently and normally distributed with a mean of 0 and a constant variance of s 2 , and with both u 0i and u 2i assumed to have multivariate normal distribution.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In Chinese culture, child care provision is viewed as a feminine role.

    “In Chinese culture (as in many other cultures), child care provision is viewed as a feminine role.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are wide discrepancies in socioeconomic and health care resources between urban and rural residents, with rural grandparents disadvantaged in health capitals.

    “With wide discrepancies in socioeconomic and health care resources between urban and rural residents, rural grandparents are clearly at a disadvantage with regard to health capitals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rural grandparents lack pension programs and are more likely to be dependent on their children.

    “With an absence of pension programs, they are much more likely to be dependent on their children.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Urban grandparents are more financially independent and have more resources, such as a larger social network and easier access to transportation.

    “In comparison, urban grandparents are much more financially independent and have more resources at their disposal (e.g., larger social network and easier access to transportation).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cultural imperative of filial piety and the expectation of adult children providing support for parents are stronger for rural than urban older adults.

    “On the one hand, the cultural imperative of filial piety, the need, and the expectation of adult children providing support for parents are stronger for rural than urban older adults.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Strong intergenerational bonds define Chinese tradition, and caring for grandchildren is often not perceived as a privilege or burden but a normative way of life for many grandparents.

    “In a context where strong intergenerational bonds define its tradition, caring for grandchildren is often not perceived as a privilege or burden but a normative way of life for many grandparents.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grandchild care is not an isolated event but an essential part of a dynamic system of family exchange.

    “It is not an isolated event but an essential part of a dynamic system of family exchange.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grandfathers are not culturally expected to be in nurturing roles and often do not do so when grandmothers are present.

    “Given that grandfathers are not culturally expected to be in nurturing roles and often do not do so when the grandmothers are present, the lack of normative support could make daily caregiving more difficult and stressful.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Caregiving requires older adults to have basic functional ability.

    “Because caregiving must require older adults to have basic functional ability, the less robust findings on ADL may not be surprising because the selection effect may be stronger.”
15 of 15

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported coefficient signs do not support the claimed urban buffer

    Major

    With higher scores indicating better health, a positive 0.09 care effect is not a negative effect. Adding the stated −0.11 urban interaction gives an urban effect of −0.02, rather than removing a negative effect.

  • Caregiving categories disagree at exactly 15 hours

    Minor

    The text assigns 15 hours per week to high-intensity care, while the table defines that category as more than 15 hours. The classification of someone providing exactly 15 hours is inconsistent.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 2005, 34, 475
  2. 1992, The Gerontologist, 37, 744
  3. 1992, 16, 51
  4. 1994, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY OF THE FAMILY, 24, 69
  5. 2001, JOURNAL OF FAMILY, 22, 557
  6. 1998, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53, 164
  7. 2002, HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2, 1387
  8. 1990, ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1, 131
  9. 1981, 3, 365
  10. 1999, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54, 376
  11. 2009, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, 489
  12. 2003, CHINA REVIEW, 3, 95

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 367

Metadata

Authors
Chen, F., & Liu, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2011-12-07
Volume
67B
Issue
1
Pages
99-112
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2134956216
Cited by
378
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
grandparenting, grandchild care, older adults' health, health trajectories, skipped-generation households, three-generation family, living arrangements, care intensity
MeSH terms
Aged, China, Family, Family Characteristics, Female, Health Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review