Cited by 193Health disparities and outcomesReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyAging, Health, and Disability

Neighborhood Deterioration, Religious Coping, and Changes in Health During Late Life

Krause, N.·1998·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Research indicates that older adults who reside in deteriorated neighborhoods experience more physical health problems than elderly people who dwell in more favorable living environments. The purpose of this study is to see whether the deleterious effects of run-down neighborhoods are reduced for older people who use religious coping responses. Data from a nationwide longitudinal survey of elderly people suggest that the noxious impact of living in a dilapidated neighborhood on changes in self-rated health over time is offset completely for older adults who rely heavily on religious coping strategies. In contrast, significant stress-buffering effects failed to emerge when functional disability served as the outcome measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/38.6.653

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 33 highest quality studies, six (18%) found worse functioning among those who were more R/S.

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, N.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
653-664
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2082556737
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG 14749, R01 AG092210, R01AG014749)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
neighborhood deterioration, religious coping, older adults, self-rated health, health status change, stress buffering, functional disability, living environment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Health Status, Housing, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review