Cited by 77Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsAging, Health, and Disability

Religiosity and Self-Rated Health among Latin American and Caribbean Elders

Reyes-Ortiz, Carlos A., Pelaez, Martha, Koenig, Harold G., Mulligan, Thomas·2007·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To describe religious affiliation, importance of religion, and the relationship between religion and self-rated health in persons aged 60 or older living in Latin America or the Caribbean. Method: We used data from seven cities (n=10,587). Multivariate models were used to analyze the associations between religious affiliation and importance of religion with socio-demographic or health factors and self-rated health. Results: Overall, 92% of the total study population had a religious affiliation; among those who are religious, 80% considered religion to be important in their lives. Half of the population (51%) reported fair or poor health. In multivariate models, older age increased odds of having a religious affiliation and religion being important. Women were about four times more likely to have a religious affiliation and over twice as likely as men to indicate that religion was important. Although religious affiliation was associated with poor health, this association was no longer significant after controlling for functional status. Older adults who considered religion as very important were less likely to report fair or poor health compared to those who were less religious (somewhat important, not very important). Conclusions: These older adults have a high prevalence of religious affiliation and most of them consider religion to be important. Better self-rated health was associated with higher self-rated religiosity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/pm.37.4.f

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 37 methodologically most rigorous studies, 21 (57%) reported significant positive relationships between R/S and SRH.

    “Of the 37 methodologically most rigorous studies, 21 (57%) reported significant positive relationships between R/S and SRH [503, 508–527], whereas three (8%) found the opposite [528–530].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reyes-Ortiz, C. A., Pelaez, M., Koenig, H. G., & Mulligan, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
  • International Consultants of Aging and Health, Inc., Miami, Florida
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • St. Bernards Healthcare, Jonesboro, Arizona
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2007-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
425-443
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2143530085
Cited by
77
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
religiosity, self-rated health, older adults, religious affiliation, gender differences, functional status, Latin America, Caribbean
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attitude to Health, Barbados, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cuba, Ethnicity, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Latin America, Male, Middle Aged, Pan American Health Organization, Religion and Psychology, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review