Cited by 202Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsHealth disparities and outcomes

Religious Attendance and Mortality: An 8-Year Follow-Up of Older Mexican Americans

Hill, T. D., Angel, J. L., Ellison, C. G., Angel, R. J.·2005·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies in the area of religion and mortality are based primarily on data derived from samples of predominantly non-Hispanic Whites. Given the importance of religion in the lives of Hispanics living in the United States, particularly older Hispanics, we examine the effects of religious attendance on mortality risk among Mexican Americans aged 65 and older. METHODS: We employ data from the Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly to predict the risk of all-cause mortality over an 8-year follow-up period. RESULT: Overall, the results show that those who attend church once per week exhibit a 32% reduction in the risk of mortality as compared with those who never attend religious services. Moreover, the benefits of weekly attendance persist with controls for sociodemographic characteristics, cardiovascular health, activities of daily living, cognitive functioning, physical mobility and functioning, social support, health behaviors, mental health, and subjective health. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that weekly church attendance may reduce the risk of mortality among older Mexican Americans. Future research should focus on identifying other potential mediators of the relationship between religious involvement and mortality risk in the Mexican-origin population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/60.2.s102

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level).

    “Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level) [548–566], whereas three (5%) reported shorter longevity [567–569].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, T. D., Angel, J. L., Ellison, C. G., & Angel, R. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, T. D.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
S102-S109
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2149055705
Cited by
202
References
84
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag018432-02)
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG18432, R01AG010939, R01 AG10939-06)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
religious service attendance, church attendance, mortality, older Mexican Americans, Hispanic older adults, all-cause mortality, religious involvement, health behavior, social support
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Religion, Risk Factors, United States, Epidemiologic Studies, Mexican Americans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review