Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction between the ligand-binding domain of the LDL receptor and the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 is required for PCSK9 to remain bound to the LDL receptor during endosomal acidification

Tveten, K., Holla, O. L., Cameron, J., Strom, T. B., Berge, K. E., Laerdahl, J. K., Leren, T. P.·2012·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) binds to the epidermal growth factor homology domain repeat A of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) at the cell surface and disrupts recycling of the internalized LDLR. As a consequence, the LDLR is rerouted to the lysosomes for degradation. Although PCSK9 may bind to an LDLR lacking the ligand-binding domain, at least three ligand-binding repeats of the ligand-binding domain are required for PCSK9 to reroute the LDLR to the lysosomes. In this study, we have studied the binding of PCSK9 to an LDLR with or without the ligand-binding domain at increasingly acidic conditions in order to mimic the milieu of the LDLR:PCSK9 complex as it translocates from the cell membrane to the sorting endosomes. These studies have shown that PCSK9 is rapidly released from an LDLR lacking the ligand-binding domain at pH in the range of 6.9-6.1. A similar pattern of release at acidic pH was also observed for the binding to the normal LDLR of mutant PCSK9 lacking the C-terminal domain. Together these data indicate that an interaction between the negatively charged ligand-binding domain of the LDLR and the positively charged C-terminal domain of PCSK9 is required for PCSK9 to remain bound to the LDLR during the early phase of endosomal acidification as the LDLR translocates from the cell membrane to the sorting endosome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddr578

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An LDLR lacking the ligand binding domain is able to internalize PCSK9 but is not degraded and instead recycles back to the plasma membrane.

    “A series of deletion studies demonstrate that an LDLR lacking the ligand binding domain is able to internalize PCSK9 but is not degraded and instead recycles back to the plasma membrane126,127.”
  • The C terminal domain of PCSK9 is not required for PCSK9 to bind and be internalized by LDLR, but appears to be required for PCSK9 to disrupt recycling of LDLR back to the cell surface.

    “The C terminal domain of PCSK9 is also not required for PCSK9 to bind and be internalized by LDLR, it appears to be required for PCSK9 to disrupt recycling of LDLR back to the cell surface126,128.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Sudhof, 1985, Science, 228, 815, 10.1126/science.2988123 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hobbs, 1990, Annual review of genetics, 24, 133, 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001025 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yamamoto, 1984, Cell, 39, 27, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2002, Science, 298, 2353, 10.1126/science.1078124 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Goldstein, 1979, Nature; Physical Science (London), 279, 679, 10.1038/279679a0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brown, 1997, Nature; Physical Science (London), 388, 629, 10.1038/41672 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2003, PNAS, 100, 928, 10.1073/pnas.0335507100 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mousavi, 2009, Journal of internal medicine, 266, 507, 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02167.x · DOI
  9. 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 18602, 10.1074/jbc.M702027200 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2008, PNAS, 105, 1820, 10.1073/pnas.0712064105 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cameron, 2008, FEBS Journal, 275, 4121, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06553.x · DOI
  12. Cunningham, 2007, Nature structural & molecular biology, 14, 413, 10.1038/nsmb1235 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Piper, 2007, Structure (London), 15, 545, 10.1016/j.str.2007.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2008, PNAS, 105, 13045, 10.1073/pnas.0806312105 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2011, The Journal of Lipid Research, 52, 78, 10.1194/jlr.M011445 · DOI
  16. 2011, The Journal of Lipid Research, 52, 1787, 10.1194/jlr.M018093 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Holla, 2010, Molecular genetics and metabolism, 99, 149, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.09.012 · DOI
  18. 2006, Human Molecular Genetics, 15, 1551, 10.1093/hmg/ddl077 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lehrman, 1985, Cell, 41, 735, 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80054-4 · DOI
  20. Basu, 1981, Cell, 24, 493, 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90340-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2011, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286, 5464, 10.1074/jbc.M110.199042 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284, 1313, 10.1074/jbc.M808363200 · DOI
  23. Strom, 2010, Molecular genetics and metabolism, 101, 76, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281, 468, 10.1074/jbc.M507071200 · DOI
  25. Tveten, 2007, FEBS Journal, 274, 1881, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05735.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tveten, K., Holla, O. L., Cameron, J., Strom, T. B., Berge, K. E., Laerdahl, J. K., & Leren, T. P.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2011-12-08
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1402-1409
ISSN
  • 0964-6906
  • 1460-2083
Cited by
56
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review