Cited by 56Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsDNA Repair Mechanisms

Genome aging: somatic mutation in the brain links age-related decline with disease and nominates pathogenic mechanisms

Open access
Lodato, Michael A, Walsh, Christopher A·2019·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Aging is a mysterious process, not only controlled genetically but also subject to random damage that can accumulate over time. While DNA damage and subsequent mutation in somatic cells were first proposed as drivers of aging more than 60 years ago, whether and to what degree these processes shape the neuronal genome in the human brain could not be tested until recent technological breakthroughs related to single-cell whole-genome sequencing. Indeed, somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) increase with age in the human brain, in a somewhat stochastic process that may nonetheless be controlled by underlying genetic programs. Evidence from the literature suggests that in addition to demonstrated increases in somatic SNVs during aging in normal brains, somatic mutation may also play a role in late-onset, sporadic neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. In this review, we will discuss somatic mutation in the human brain, mechanisms by which somatic mutations occur and can be controlled, and how this process can impact human health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddz191

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Somatic mutations induced by erroneous DNA damage repair or transposable elements are a common feature of neural development, giving rise to neuron diversity through genomic mosaicism.

    “somatic mutations induced by erroneous DNA damage repair or transposable elements are a common feature of neural development, giving rise to neuron diversity through genomic mosaicism”

    From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Lodato & Walsh, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]36. Knouse K.A., Wu J. and Amon A. (2016) Assessment of megabase-scale somatic copy number variation using single-cell sequencing. Genome Res, 26, 376–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lodato, M. A., & Walsh, C. A.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Christopher A
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2019-09-06
Volume
28
Issue
R2
Pages
R197-R206
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2977413235
Cited by
56
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K99 AG054749, R01 NS35129,, R01 NS032457)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH106883)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
somatic mutations, brain aging, somatic single nucleotide variants, DNA damage, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative diseases, age-related decline, pathophysiological mechanisms, single-cell whole-genome sequencing
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Mutation, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review