Cited by 138Endometriosis Research and TreatmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Measuring quality of life in women with endometriosis: tests of data quality, score reliability, response rate and scaling assumptions of the Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire

Open access
Jones, G., Jenkinson, C., Taylor, N., Mills, A., Kennedy, S.·2006·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To test the data quality, scaling assumptions and scoring algorithms underlying the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire: a questionnaire developed to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of women with endometriosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional postal survey to 727 women with surgically confirmed endometriosis recruited from an existing genetic linkage study (OXEGENE), The National Endometriosis Society (NES), UK and the outpatient gynaecology clinics of the Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Tests of data quality included secondary factor analysis, internal reliability consistency, descriptive statistics of the data, missing data levels, floor and ceiling effects and corrected item to total correlation scores. RESULTS: Six hundred and ten women (83.9%) returned the questionnaire. Secondary factor analysis verified the domain structure of the EHP-30. All 11 dimensions were internally reliable with Cronbach's alpha scores ranging from 0.80 to 0.96. Missing response rates ranged from 0.2 to 1.3%, and all items were found to be most highly correlated with their own (corrected) scale. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirmed the factor structure, scoring and scaling assumptions of the questionnaire. The high rate of data completeness indicated that the EHP-30 was acceptable and understandable to the respondents, thereby verifying its suitability for measuring the HRQoL of women with endometriosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/del231

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Swash M and Levvy G (2001) ALSAQ User Man- ual: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire. Health Serv- ices Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  2. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, G., Jenkinson, C., Taylor, N., Mills, A., & Kennedy, S.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2006-07-04
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
2686-2693
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2115109894
Cited by
138
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
endometriosis, health-related quality of life, Endometriosis Health Profile-30, questionnaire validation, factor structure, internal consistency, missing data, floor and ceiling effects, scaling assumptions, women's health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Endometriosis, Female, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review