Cited by 98Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Post-operative oral contraceptive use reduces the risk of ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic excision

Takamura, M., Koga, K., Osuga, Y., Takemura, Y., Hamasaki, K., Hirota, Y., Yoshino, O., Taketani, Y.·2009·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of post-operative oral contraceptives (OCs) use on the rate of recurrence after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma. METHODS: In May 2005, we introduced a 'post-operative OC recommendation' for patients treated with laparoscopic excision of endometrioma. That is, at the time of the operation, we provided each patient with information about OC, known and possible benefits and risks and let her decide whether to take OC. A retrospective cohort study included 87 patients who underwent a laparoscopy after May 2005. The endometrioma recurrence rate at 24 months was compared between those who used OC for the entire follow-up period OC (n = 34) and all of the others (n = 53). We also performed logistic regression analysis to identify variables associated with recurrence. A before-after study included another 224 patients who underwent a laparoscopy before May 2005 and compared the recurrence rate before and after introduction of the 'post-operative OC recommendation'. RESULTS: The recurrence rate in those who used OC for the entire period was significantly lower than in the 'others' group (2.9 versus 35.8%, relative risk 0.082, 95% CI 0.012-0.58, P < 0.001). Post-operative OC was determined as an independent variable associated with lower recurrence (OR 0.054, 95% CI 0.007-0.429, P < 0.001). The overall recurrence rate in patients who underwent laparoscopy after the introduction of the 'post-operative OC recommendation' was significantly lower than that in patients who received laparoscopy before the introduction (18.6 versus 33.1%, relative risk 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative OC use reduces the risk of ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic excision. This information will help in appropriate planning of pre- and post-operative management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dep297

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • COCs prevent and reduce the frequency and severity of recurrent dysmenorrhea and relapse of endometriosis after surgery.

    “Some studies showed that COCs prevent and reduce frequency and severity of recurrent dysmenorrhea and relapse of endometriosis after surgery [252–256].”

    From Hormonal treatments for endometriosis: The endocrine background (2022) · cites this paper as [254]

    The Retrospective cohort study reports substantially lower ovarian endometrioma recurrence with continuous postoperative OC use. But the Before-after study found no significant reduction in pain recurrence, and the Discussion says pain severity was not assessed quantitatively. This paper therefore does not support the claimed reduction in recurrent dysmenorrhea frequency or severity. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takamura, M., Koga, K., Osuga, Y., Takemura, Y., Hamasaki, K., Hirota, Y., Yoshino, O., & Taketani, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2009-08-14
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
3042-3048
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2135797304
Cited by
98
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometrioma, oral contraceptives, endometrioma recurrence, laparoscopic resection, postoperative hormonal therapy, recurrence prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Protocols, Combined Modality Therapy, Contraceptives, Oral, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Ovarian Diseases, Ovariectomy, Patient Compliance, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Statistics as Topic, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review